Wednesday, November 30, 2011

MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AGAINST CLERK/MAGISTRATE: BROCKTON SUPERIOR COURT - ABUSE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AGAINST CLERK/MAGISTRATE: BROCKTON SUPERIOR COURT - ABUSE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

__________________________________________________________________________

RELEASE ORDERED IMMEDIATELY

HRRG, IHRRC, LIMPT, INC. & ASSOCIATES
(EDUCATION & WORKFORCE PROJECT -  USA CHAPTER)
c/o Dr. Phillip C. Ofume
P. O. Box 2416
Lynn, MA 01903
Tel.  857-266-2253/781-479-9027
E-mail: limptintinc@gmail.com
globalaids_hivcureinteraction@yahoo.co.uk
humanrights.researchgroup@gmail.com

_____________________________________________________________________


Our Ref. Ofu.F./IHRRGC-LIMPT&A./11-11/Letter/9887         Date: November 25, 2011

Executive Director
MA Complaint Against Clerk/Magistrate
Committee on Professional Responsibility for Clerks of the Court
John Adam Courthouse,
One Pembertom Square
Boston, MA 02108

Complainant's Name/Address:  Dr. Phillip Chukwuma  Ofume, 506 Warren Avenue, Brockton, MA 02301 Tel. 781-479-9027 ofume.phillip@gmail.com


Respondent's Name:  Clerk/Magistrate of Brockton Supwerior Court, 72 Belmont St Ste 1 Brockton, MA 02301 (508) 583-8250. Court staff and Clerk/Magistate gave different names. On Plymonth Superior Court Department which the umbrella, Complainant unable to select his name.

                                             COMPLAINT

A.                                           SUMMARY


1.     In this complaint, The Hon. Justice Jeffrey A. Locke works with the Clerk/Magistrate of the Brockton Superior Court, Brockton, MA to sanction and demobilize Complainant's four different lawsuits in which two of the four cases will prevent six Black Children and two Black parents from homelessness, loss of education, starvation and removal of these children by criminals  (DCF/DSS and its child vendor clients).  Judge Locke was former Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families(DCF) or Department of Social Services (DSS).


2.         Under outside manipulation, the Clerk/Magistrate has impounded three most important, urgent and life saving cases of the four cases filed with Brockton Superior Court. In the other front, the Assistant Court Clerks have been searching for these two cases  of the three cases without success because the Clerk/Magistrate must have kept them  in unseen place or took the case files to his home or to his sponsors to get favor.


3.      Restating in contest that Judge Locke was former Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families(DCF) or Department of Social Services (DSS). Social services in the United States  include but unlimited to Adoption of Children, Foster Kid program, Orphage program, child benefits, housing, food stamps, cash benefit, families and homeless shelters,  etc. The defendants in Complainant's four different and unrelated lawsuits are DCF/DSS and its staffs, Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), Department of Transitional Assistance (DTA), Holyoke Police Department (HPD), utility companies, education, etc. In the United States, in major part, these agencies and companies supported by courts/police are threat to talented/smart/gifted/A  /A+/B+ non-white children/families, and  non-white educated, professionals, investors and related group. The Judge and Clerk/Magistrate are whites and in these cases they are working hard to see that these children are removed by the DCF and family and parents are destroyed.


4.        Complainant filed four different and unrelated Complaints with Brockton Superior Court. Clerk/Magistrate of this Court, hide three complaints among which are two most urgent complaints which were filed to be held under emergency to enable defendant (Department of Housing and Community Development -DHCD)  transfer unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton, MA to enable Complainant use the unused seven months shelter benefits to stop the politicized Notice of Eviction now placed on FAST Summary Process Trial to evict Complainant and his family to enable DCF re-seize Complainant's children to do three major harms such as disrupt Complainant's Campaign for the President of Nigeria 2015, seize Complainant's children to disorganize the family or stop the criminal investigation in Canada which involves theft of over $150,000.00 of the Complainant's children benefits (2005 - present) and obstruct AAAA campaign for President 2012 because Complainant is strong Nominee for the National President of  The American Association for Affirmation Action (AAAA).


5.            In Brockton Superior Court, The Hon. Justice Jeffrey A. Locke and Clerk/Magistrate connived together  to implement severe forms of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE under vicious extra-process/procedural malpractice via Conflict of Interest, to the extent that the major defendants are Department of Children and Families (DCF) and its staff, to the extent that Judge Locke is former Commissioner of DCF and openly defending DCF in open Court and sanctioning Complainant from filing lawsuits against his former employer, DCF; to the extent that action of Judge Locke clearly and avertly  identifies support for the persecutory action of DCF against Complainant and other uglier action of Complainant's political rivals;  to the extent that they (rivals) have used rush court eviction /homelessness, seizure of Complainant's children by DCF and economic sanction/ persecution as tools to distabilize Complainant's campaign for the President of Nigeria 2015; to the extent that  the following cases which will  stop seizure of Complainant's children via eviction /homelessness and harsh economic  sanction and persecution have been sanctioned and placed in a hiden place and the assistant clerks have searched for the most important two cases (b and d below); to the extent that Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate have sanctioned the three emergency lawsuits that would stop these paid political action; to the extent that these three cases are summarized as follows b, c. and d );   to the extent that the Eviction Summary Proceedings before the Brockton Housing Court is returnable for December 7, 2011 and this rush eviction/homelessness is the 8th in less than two years;  and to the extent that  in SECRET COURTROOM Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate made mockery of Complainant and consolidated these different cases and called them one case and issued one docket number 11-126A to the four different and unrelated cases  and ordered that summons not be issued to three in which two of the three are most important to save the terrible irreparable harms listed below and above.

6.   The four Cases and cause of action are as follows:  


a. Police arrest, improper and punitive handcuff, parade of children and adult before the public, charges, and prosecution - Holyoke Police Department (HPD) et a. l Phillip Ofume v. HPD Docket No. ?

b.  Transfer of family unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton - Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) - Phillip Ofume v. DHCD Docket No.  ?

c.  Unlawful impounding, seizure, confiscation  and possession of properties and goods valued over $60million belonging to Dr. Phillip C. Ofume and Mrs. Maureen N. Ofume and their children and NGOs -Phillip Ofume v. DCF et al Docket No. 11- 1260

d.   Payment of child and adult benefits - DTA.  Phillip Ofume v. DTA Docket No. ?
                                             

 B.                                                            FACT

7.              The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke  was  former Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families (DCF) or Department of Social Services (DSS).  Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate have created obstructive consolidation of four different and unrelated cases to obstruct justice and waive burden of adverse decision on Judge Locke's former check cutter or employer (DCF/DSS).



8.            Unofficially and officially, directly and indirectly, all the defendants/respondents mentioned in paragraph 1 above are connected by several corruptive ways such as color, race, political affiliation, etc. DCF and its staff are lead defendants in two of the four lawsuits. The two  cases listed as b and d are sanctioned by the Judge and Clerk/Magistrate to enable eviction/homelessness take place to enable seizure of children occur. These agencies and related service providers ( mayors, court/Judges, DCF/DSS, DHCD, DTA, police/sheriff, etc) have worked together under the clout of color, race and extended  politics to implement these incesant homelessness and brutal economic sanction/persecution path to re-seize Complainant's children which is not mentioned in this Complaint to the extent that there is an on-going case in Canada   of the theft of over $150,000.00 of Complainant's children benefits  which they want to sweep under the rug by re-seizing these children and eliminating other benefitiaries or parents (see the disclosure of the Government of Canada on this theft).  



9.   Effective October 25, 2011 Clerk/Magistrate started receiving these four lawsuits and impounded and seized them and either takes them home or keeps them in hidden location where assistant clerks and other court staff will not locate the case files. Complainant/Plaintiff has visited the clerk's office several times and called for his file. Remarkably two  staff have tried to find the case files in place where majority/minority of the case files are kept but they failed to find the files.


10.     Three ( Ofume v. DHCD,  Ofume v. DCF et al and Ofume v. DTA)  of the four cases are cases of less than 48 hours emergency to single Judge and taken by The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke. These cases are emergency  because DCF and other calloborators  have setup another plot to again and again use Eviction and homelessness to re-seize Complainant/Plaintiff's children as they did on January 31, 2011 and custody restated on February 8, 2011 by Order of Judge presiding in the Holyoke Juvenile Court.


11.     Judge Jeffrey and Clerk/Magistrate of the Brockton Superior Court have censored docketing and hearing of the emergency complaint, Ofume v. DHCD which is Emergency Complaint seeking short Order in nature of commanding DHCD to transfer Complainant's over seven months unused family shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton to enable Complainant and his family continue the rent at their apartment in Brockton which was politically placed under summary eviction proceedings in Brockton District Court (Housing Division) on October 27, 2011.  Notwithstanding that no rent was owing under USCIS Nebraska Service Center politically motivated delay to approve Complainant and his family's EAD  and application for renewal of EAD which was made since January 1, 2011 early  enough for EAD which will expire on April 29, 2011. USCIS  joined Judges, Clerk/Magistrate, courts, DHCD, DTA, landlords, etc to  sanction right to work and right to other services including right to file cases in Court, etc. and put income of this family at $0.00.


12.    August 2009 - present, Plaintiff and his family have suffered 7 evictions and several homelessness and 8th plot is about to occur.  Judge Jeffrey and Clerk/Magistrate are delaying Complainant's emergency complaint (Ofume v. DHCD) to enable Brockton District Court (Housing Division) issue EVICTION ORDER against the Complainant and his family to enable DCF re-seize the children of the Complainant.


13.   Another important emergency Complaint censored by the Clerk/Magistrate is  Ofume v. DTA and Ofume v. DCF et al. Ofume v. DTA is requesting this court to order DTA to pay benefits  (food stamps, cash benefit, etc) to Plaintiff/Complainant's children and adults pending issuance of Employment Authorization Document (EAD) by the USCIS, Nebraska Service Center and employment. At present, the income of the family is $0.00/month. Across the United States these are the secret actions of the DCF/DSS designed to seize the children of non-whites and others profiled which setting affloat this plot DCF/DSS accuses them as being unable in task to provide for their children or family.



14.   In the court proceedings, Judge Jeffrey acts like Commissioner of DCF/DSS and he disbelieves Complainant and believed  DCF and other defendants. For example during full court costs hearing, to have free day in branding Complainant liar and throwing full support for  DCF  the Clerk and Judge Locke tactically evacuated the courtroom to create SECRET COURTROOM. After removing attorneys and others in the courtroom, one attorney stayed in to know what's up but the clerk/magistrate carefully removed him and  Judge Locke rose to enable complete evacuation occur before the court backup for the secret  hearing of Complainant/Plaintiff's cases.

15.     Effective October 25, 2011 Dr. Phillip Chukwuma Ofume filed four (4) different lawsuits against DCF, Holyoke Police Department, DCF and Staffs of DCF, Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistance (DTA) and New England Farm Workers Council (NEFWC) and its Staff


16.     These four different and unrelated cases filed with the Brockton Supewrior Court and only one Complaint  which not is important at this material time has been assigned Docket Number 11-1260.  Restating that two cases ( b and d) of the four complaints or cases require less than 48 hours emergency hearing and order to enable defendants transfer unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton and issue temporary vouchers to stop politicized court eviction which is politically designed to re-seize Complainant's children. To properly understand that the presiding Judge  is more of  DCF/DSS Commissioner in court, he sanctioned  the two cases that will prevent six Black Children and two Black parents from homelessness, loss of education, starvation and removal of these children by criminals  (DCF/DSS and its child vendor clients). In the other front, the Assistant Court Clerks have been searching for these two cases without success because the Clerk/Magistrate must have kept in unseen place or took the case files to his home or to his sponsors to get favor.


 17.     In two proceedings Judge Locke encountered enormous difficulty and unable to act or rule against DCF/DSS. The Clerk of Court is informant and  errand runner to/from Judge Locke and he (Clerk) hijacked and censored  three major complaints which are urgent tools to stop 8th politicized eviction/homelessness in less than two years. Soon after and started campaigning for consolidation of all the four (4) different and unrelated complaints .


18.     Complainant strongly Objects to Consolidation because it is designed to obstruct justice, delay the complaints to facilitate issuance of eviction order, hasten removal of children by the defendants:      These are four different and unrelated  cases and summarized by fact/evidence of Cause of Action as follows:
When Plaintiff asked  Judge Locke to explain why these cases must be consolidated, Judge Locke said nothing.


Consolidation will destroy and obstruct intended justice in these four different and unrelated lawsuits:


a. Police arrest, improper and punitive handcuff, parade of children and adult before the public, charges, and prosecution - Holyoke Police Department (HPD) et a. l Phillip Ofume v. HPD Docket No. ?


b.  Transfer of family unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton - Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) - Phillip Ofume v. DHCD Docket No.  ?

c.  Unlawful impounding, seizure, confiscation  and possession of properties and goods valued over $60million belonging to Dr. Phillip C. Ofume and Mrs. Maureen N. Ofume and their children and NGOs -Phillip Ofume v. DCF et al Docket No. 11- 1260


d.   Payment of child and adult benefits - DTA.  Phillip Ofume v. DTA Docket No. ?

 

                                       Conclusion/Relief


Very Urgent, Complainant request   removal  of the Clerk/Magistrate  from the Complainant's four (4) lawsuits filed with this Court starting from October 25, 2011 because of associational conflict of interest, questionable mindset which impedes the ability of the Judge and Clerk/Magistrate to act judiciously and in good faith, Clerk/Magistrate deceived the Judge and proposed consolidation of these four cases because of personal interest,  prevent consolidation of these  four different and unrelated cases which aim to brew obstruction of justice, urgent consideration of emergency fact/evidence to stop the plot mentioned above by recommending urgent action,  action of the Clerk/Magistrate  will lead to obstruction of intended justice against public interest and leading Complainant and his family to suffer expanded irreparable harm.  

 Respectfully submitted,

For:  IHRRG, IHRRC, LIMPT, INC. & ASSOCIATES
(EDUCATION & WORKFORCE PROJECT -  USA CHAPTER)

____________________
Phillip  C. Ofume, Ph.D
Complainant and National Coordinator
506 Warren Avenue #2 Brockton, MA  02301 Tel. 781-479-9027 E-mail: limptintinc@gmail.com,humanrights.researchgroup@gmail.com,      globalaids_hivcureinteraction@yahoo.co.uk

MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT: BROCKTON SUPERIOR COURT

MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT: BROCKTON SUPERIOR COURT

November 30, 2011
__________________________________________________________________________________

                        PLYMOUTH SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT
                       Brockton Superior Court, Brockton, MA  Session
               
                      Complaint Against The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke
                           
                             SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF COMPLAINT

                                              Summary of Complaint

 Hon. Justice Jeffrey A. Locke and Clerk/Magistrate connived together  to implement severe forms of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE under vicious extra-process/procedural malpractice via Conflict of Interest, to the extent that the major defendants are Department of Children and Families (DCF) and its staff, to the extent that Judge Locke is former Commissioner of DCF and openly defending DCF in open Court and sanctioning Complainant from filing lawsuits against his former employer, DCF; to the extent that action of Judge Locke clearly and avertly  identifies support for the persecutory action of DCF against Complainant and other uglier action of Complainant's political rivals;  to the extent that they (rivals) have used rush court eviction /homelessness, seizure of Complainant's children by DCF and economic sanction/ persecution as tools to distabilize Complainant's campaign for the President of Nigeria 2015; to the extent that  the following cases which will  stop seizure of Complainant's children via eviction /homelessness and harsh economic  sanction and persecution have been sanctioned and placed in a hiden place and the assistant clerks have searched for the most important two cases (b and d below); to the extent that Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate have sanctioned the three emergency lawsuits that would stop these paid political action; to the extent that these three cases are summarized as follows b, c. and d );   to the extent that the Eviction Summary Proceedings before the Brockton Housing Court is returnable for December 7, 2011 and this rush eviction/homelessness is the 8th in less than two years;  and to the extent that  in SECRET COURTROOM Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate made mockery of Complainant and consolidated these different cases and called them one case and issued one docket number 11-126A to the four cases  and ordered that summons not be issued to move the cases forward:    


a. Police arrest, improper and punitive handcuff, parade of children and adult before the public, charges, and prosecution - Holyoke Police Department (HPD) et a. l Phillip Ofume v. HPD Docket No. ?


b.  Transfer of family unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton - Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) - Phillip Ofume v. DHCD Docket No.  ?


c.  Unlawful impounding, seizure, confiscation  and possession of properties and goods valued over $60million belonging to Dr. Phillip C. Ofume and Mrs. Maureen N. Ofume and their children and NGOs -Phillip Ofume v. DCF et al Docket No. 11- 1260


d.   Payment of child and adult benefits - DTA.  Phillip Ofume v. DTA Docket No. ?
                                             

                                                             Fact

1.              The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke  - Former Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families (DCF) or Department of Social Services (DSS).  Judge Locke and Clerk of the Court have created consolidation of four different and unrelated cases to obstruct justice and waive burden of adverse decision on Judge Locke's former check cutter or employer or  DCF/DSS.

2.            Unofficially and officially, directly and indirectly, all the defendants/respondents mentioned in paragraph 1 above are connected by several corruptive ways such as color, race, political affiliation, etc. DCF and its staff are lead defendants in two of the four lawsuits. The two  cases listed as b and d are sanctioned by the Judge and Clerk/Magistrate to enable eviction/homelessness take place to enable seizure of children occur. These agencies and related service providers ( mayors, court/Judges, DCF/DSS, DHCD, DTA, police/sheriff, etc) have worked together under the clout of color, race and extended  politics to implement these incesant homelessness and brutal economic sanction/persecution path to re-seize Complainant's children which is not mentioned in this Complaint to the extent that there is an on-going case in Canada   of the theft of over $150,000.00 of Complainant's children benefits  which they want to sweep under the rug by re-seizing these children and eliminating other benefitiaries or parents (see the disclosure of the Government of Canada on this theft).  


3.   Effective October 25, 2011 Clerk/Magistrate started receiving these four lawsuits and impounded and seized them and either takes them home or keeps them in hidden location where assistant clerks and other court staff will not locate the case files. Complainant/Plaintiff has visited the clerk's office several times and called for his file. Remarkably two  staff have tried to find the case files in place where majority/minority of the case files are kept but they failed to find the files.


4.     Three ( Ofume v. DHCD,  Ofume v. DCF et al and Ofume v. DTA)  of the four cases are cases of less than 48 hours emergency to single Judge and taken by The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke. These cases are emergency  because DCF and other calloborators  have setup another plot to again and again use Eviction and homelessness to re-seize Complainant/Plaintiff's children as they did on January 31, 2011 and custody restated on February 8, 2011 by Order of Judge presiding in the Holyoke Juvenile Court.


5.     Judge Jeffrey and Clerk/Magistrate of the Brockton Superior Court have censored docketing and hearing of the emergency complaint, Ofume v. DHCD which is Emergency Complaint seeking short Order in nature of commanding DHCD to transfer Complainant's over seven months unused family shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton to enable Complainant and his family continue the rent at their apartment in Brockton which was politically placed under summary eviction proceedings in Brockton District Court (Housing Division) on October 27, 2011.  Notwithstanding that no rent was owing under USCIS Nebraska Service Center politically motivated delay to approve Complainant and his family's EAD  and application for renewal of EAD which was made since January 1, 2011 early  enough for EAD which will expire on April 29, 2011. USCIS  joined Judges, Clerk/Magistrate, courts, DHCD, DTA, landlords, etc to  sanction right to work and right to other services including right to file cases in Court, etc. and put income of this family at $0.00.


6.    August 2009 - present, Plaintiff and his family have suffered 7 evictions and several homelessness and 8th plot is about to occur.  Judge Jeffrey and Clerk/Magistrate are delaying Complainant's emergency complaint (Ofume v. DHCD) to enable Brockton District Court (Housing Division) issue EVICTION ORDER against the Complainant and his family to enable DCF re-seize the children of the Complainant.


7.   Another important emergency Complaint censored by the Clerk/Magistrate is  Ofume v. DTA and Ofume v. DCF et al. Ofume v. DTA is requesting this court to order DTA to pay benefits  (food stamps, cash benefit, etc) to Plaintiff/Complainant's children and adults pending issuance of Employment Authorization Document (EAD) by the USCIS, Nebraska Service Center and employment. At present, the income of the family is $0.00/month. Across the United States these are the secret actions of the DCF/DSS designed to seize the children of non-whites and others profiled which setting affloat this plot DCF/DSS accuses them as being unable in task to provide for their children or family.


8.   In the court proceedings, Judge Jeffrey acts like Commissioner of DCF/DSS and he disbelieves Complainant and believed  DCF and other defendants. For example during full court costs hearing, to have free day in branding Complainant liar and throwing full support for  DCF  the Clerk and Judge Locke tactically evacuated the courtroom to create SECRET COURTROOM. After removing attorneys and others in the courtroom, one attorney stayed in to know what's up but the clerk carefully removed him and  Judge Locke rose to enable complete evacuation occur before the court backup for the secret  hearing of Complainant/Plaintiff's cases.


9.     Effective October 25, 2011 Dr. Phillip Chukwuma Ofume filed four (4) different lawsuits against DCF, Holyoke Police Department, DCF and Staffs of DCF, Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistance (DTA) and New England Farm Workers Council (NEFWC) and its Staff


10.     These four different and unrelated cases filed with the Brockton Supewrior Court and only one Complaint  which not is important at this material time has been assigned Docket Number 11-1260.  Restating that two cases ( b and d) of the four complaints or cases require less than 48 hours emergency hearing and order to enable defendants transfer unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton and issue temporary vouchers to stop politicized court eviction which is politically designed to re-seize Complainant's children. To properly understand that the presiding Judge  is more of  DCF/DSS Commissioner in court, he sanctioned  the two cases that will prevent six Black Children and two Black parents from homelessness, loss of education, starvation and removal of these children by criminals  (DCF/DSS and its child vendor clients). In the other front, the Assistant Court Clerks have been searching for these two cases without success because the Clerk/Magistrate must have kept in unseen place or took the case files to his home or to his sponsors to get favor.


 11.     In two proceedings Judge Locke encountered enormous difficulty and unable to act or rule against DCF/DSS. The Clerk of Court is informant and  errand runner to/from Judge Locke and he (Clerk) hijacked and censored  three major complaints which are urgent tools to stop 8th politicized eviction/homelessness in less than two years. Soon after and started campaigning for consolidation of all the four (4) different and unrelated complaints .


12.     Complainant strongly Objects to Consolidation because it is designed to obstruct justice, delay the complaints to facilitate issuance of eviction order, hasten removal of children by the defendants:      These are four different and unrelated  cases and summarized by fact/evidence of Cause of Action as follows:
When Plaintiff asked  Judge Locke to explain why these cases must be consolidated, Judge Locke said nothing.


Consolidation will destroy and obstruct intended justice in these four different and unrelated lawsuits:

a. Police arrest, improper and punitive handcuff, parade of children and adult before the public, charges, and prosecution - Holyoke Police Department (HPD) et a. l Phillip Ofume v. HPD Docket No. ?


b.  Transfer of family unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton - Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) - Phillip Ofume v. DHCD Docket No.  ?


c.  Unlawful impounding, seizure, confiscation  and possession of properties and goods valued over $60million belonging to Dr. Phillip C. Ofume and Mrs. Maureen N. Ofume and their children and NGOs -Phillip Ofume v. DCF et al Docket No. 11- 1260


d.   Payment of child and adult benefits - DTA.  Phillip Ofume v. DTA Docket No. ?



                                                                     Relief


In accordance with Section 3B(9) of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Code of Judicial Conduct and strongly reliant on the foregoing,  Complainant request this Honourable Commission to immediately and expressly  remove The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke from the  Complainant's four (4) Complaints filed with this Court starting from October 25, 2011,  because of conflict of interest, abused mindset which impedes the ability of the Judge and Clerk/Magistrate to act judiciously and in good faith, prevent consolidation of four different and unrelated cases which aim to brew obstruction of justice, urgent consideration of emergency fact/evidence to stop the plot mentioned above, because Judge Locke is former commissioner of the defendants or DCF and its staff and he is handicapped to use available  remedies such as  just rule or rule of law against his former eemployer, obstruction of intended justice and leading Complainant and his family to suffer expanded irreparable harm variously aforementioned.  



 Respectfully submitted,
For:  IHRRG, IHRRC, LIMPT, INC. & ASSOCIATES
(EDUCATION & WORKFORCE PROJECT -  USA CHAPTER)

____________________
Phillip  C. Ofume, Ph.D
Complainant and National Coordinator
506 Warren Avenue #2 Brockton, MA  02301 Tel. 781-479-9027 E-mail: limptintinc@gmail.com,humanrights.researchgroup@gmail.com,      globalaids_hivcureinteraction@yahoo.co.uk

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (AAAA) TO HARVEST MEMBERSHIP AND PARTNERSHIP OF INTERNATIONAL /DOMESTIC PROFESSIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (AAAA) TO HARVEST  MEMBERSHIP AND PARTNERSHIP OF INTERNATIONAL /DOMESTIC  PROFESSIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS


November  24, 2011


The American Association for Affirmative Action (AAAA) must reach a project, cooperant and program level of mainataining over $2.5 billion development and expansion project target and utilization because AAAA will not stay outside and talk to service sectors and providers of services without becoming provider, collaborator and  co-cooperant  of services (Education, Training and Manpower Development , Industry and  Investment, Health Care/Delivery, etc.).

It's hard to know what is inside without becoming part of inside.

AAAA is needed in 21st century more than past centuries because of the wide asymmetric  situation between racial, gender, disabled  and ethnic groups.

Again and again said that poverty gap between whites and non-whites is  abuse of multi-cultural/racial/color/ethnic, federalism and commonwealth of the United States of America.

Membership and participation in several international social and economic development group via project/program will make AAAA more connected to local and international communities  and closer to the grassroot needies.

http://universal-fashion-art-music.blogspot.com/2011/11/aaaa-is-into-modern-age-modern-action.html


Articled by:


Phillip C. Ofume, Ph.D.
Nominee for President of the AAAA 2012

Friday, November 25, 2011

LANDLORD CONNECTION & RST INVESTMENT GROUP v. OFUME - BROCKTON DISTRICT COURT



LANDLORD CONNECTION & RST INVESTMENT GROUP  v. OFUME - BROCKTON DISTRICT COURT  -  MARKETPLACE TO DIG GOLD

November 24, 2011

These landlords are crook and manipulated by the political opponents of the CounterClaim Defendant, Dr. Phillip C. Ofume. 

Secretly under business with the Court, they selected the name of one child from a family of seven children and two parents and filed summary proceedings (eviction notice) and the family viewed the process  as clerical error and attended court on November 23, 2011.

Swiftly the case below without docket number was advanced and placed  for hearing on November 23, 2011 at 8.30 a.m. The Defendant came to court at 8.00 a.m. and finished all entries and the process is that all parties will stay outside under the instruction of one of the assistant court clerks. 

Name call starts and continues and through all names without calling Defendant but these landlord brought several tenants to court and one by one they entered secret rooms and come out, several were crying. The clerks dd not call the defendant but he knows that the clerk, landlords and attorney were doing his case in a secret room. After all the parties that filled the court lobby have left the landlord and the clerk came to Defendant to say that his child did not come and so default order has been issued against his child who is not party to the lease and other negotiation stated below. 


 The analysis and question defendant asked them is that the court received his notice of appearance and seven-page defence and this morning he was registered by the clerk as one of the defendants and representative for his family, why is that the court proceeded in secret room without inviting him? 


Defendant found that other tenants were going into the secret room to see the landlord  and housing clerk/housing officers. Tenants called them "housing specialist" and they adjudicate upon case as a judge similar to the primitive colonial district court. Victims are harshly interrogated and asked "when are you going to leave landlord's apartment?" Victims may try to show them their defense and they will reply, "we are not interested...We want to know when you will leave the apartment and whereby a traumatized tenant is unable to say something, he/she will say, ...ok I want you to leave three days time or sheriff will move you out.."  Thereafter, they will request the landlord or his attorney to say something. District by district they follow almost the same crude or primitive style of interrogatory people to get additional money from poor tenants. 

On November 23, 2011 some of the tenants said that they told them to pay $200 or $170.00 to their lawyers excluding other charges and the rent and vacate the premise. Thereafter, they will compel them to sign agreement with the landlord. The agreement will be written and the tenants will sign.  Some of the tenants including the defendant in the case below are not owing these landlords.  

Defendant want to meet the Judge because the case can not be mediated but the clerks have placed the judge inside and continue to act as the judge. They hide documents and other defence submissions and go to distort information before presiding judge. Same thing is going on in Brockton Superior Court, Lawrence Superior, etc.




+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                        COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 
                               BROCKTON DISTRICT TRIAL COURT
       HOUSING DEPARTMENT                     SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

Plymouth/Bristol, ss.                                            Docket No.____________________
___________________________________________________________________________________

                                            RST Investment Group & Landlord Connection
                                                                                  Plaintiffs
                                                       v.
                                  
                                            Phillip Ofume, Keynes Ofume et al
                                                                      CounterClaim Defendants
_____________________________________________________________________________________

COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDENTS’ OPPOSITION TO  THE PLAINTIFFS’ RETALIATORY EVICTION NOTICE OF A COURT CASE TO EVICT OFUME FAMILY, TENANTS AT 506 WARREN AVENUE APARTMENT 2 BROCKTON, MA 02301 FOR  CLAIM OF “RENT IS IN ARREARS” WITHOUT RECOGNIZING TENANT’S RIGHTS AND ABUSE OF TENANT’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS PURSUANT TO .G.L. CHAPTER 23B, SECTION 30; M.G.L. CHAPTER 186 SEC. 18; M.G.L. CHAPTER 111; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SANITARY, CODE CHAPTER 11; MINIMUM STANDARDS OF FITNESS FOR HUMAN HABITATION; 105 CMR 410.000; M.G.L. CHAPTER 239, SEC. 8A;  5th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States and also vested in Bill of Rights; Tenancy with a Lease;
_____________________________________________________________________________________
 
Lead CounterClaim Defendant,  Dr. Phillip Chukwuma Ofume on  behalf his family moves this Honourable Court for Order dismissing Plaintiff’s retaliatory Eviction Notice (EXHIBIT A)   and falsified claim with costs more than the sum of the yearly lease ($16,200.00) added to special and general damages ($25,000.00)  be paid in full to the Defendants because of  the following reason:


                                     QUESTION IN ISSUE/HISTORY & ANALYSIS

Whether  “RENT IS IN ARREARS” as claimed by landlords who love money and big life and reject tenants’ rights or Constitution of the United States and Bill of Rights..


Analysis:

In October 2011 under Tenancy with a Lease,  thus  when Plaintiffs (landlords) proceeded to Court to file

                                                                     1
OFUME V. RST ET AL


EVICTION NOTICE without preliminary QUIT NOTICE there was no rents in arrears as bogusly claimed under political animosity,  consideration of the sum of  $2025.00 (TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE US DOLLARS) on after October 27, 2011.  Plaintiffs rejected payment by check, bank draft and credit card and demanded for only cash.

Because of Plaintiffs’ mistreatment of the Defendants including blatant  refusal to fix any of the several severe and minor defects (EXHIBITS B & C) across disputed apartment,  Defendants decided to withhold November 2011 and  further rents pending determination of this Court and BOARD OF HEALTH,  


a.  Landlord:


The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that when a landlord fails to maintain a dwelling in habitable condition, a tenant may properly withhold a portion of the rent from the date the landlord has notice of this breach of warrant of habit-ability.

b.  Tenant
“As a tenant, you have a legal responsibility to pay your landlord for the use of a place that is in decent condition. Massachusetts law also provides you with rights that protect the payments you make to the landlord (M.G.L. c. 186, § 15B)

Plaintiffs are corporate body and incorporated in the Commonwealth State of Massachusetts but they don’t receive money with their own name and OFFICIAL RECEIPTS, BANK CHECK, BANK DRAFT,  CREDIT CARD and related government approved legal mechanism. Without legal reason, Plaintiffs allow only PAYMENT BY CASH and receipt issued is ANONYMOUS RECEIPT (EXHIBIT E).  CounterClaim Defendants relocated to the City of Brockton from Lynn and their bank accounts are in Lynn and their banks allow external cash withdrawal of small amount.
Payment history summarized:  August 13, 2011 through October 2011

     
a.      PLAINTIFFS’ ANONYMOUS RECEIPT No. 734521   $2,600.00  (08/13/2011) EXHIBIT F
b.      PLAINTIFFS’ ANONYMOUS RECEIPT No.  734520  $40.00 (08/13/2011)  EXHBIT G
c.      PLAINTIFFS’ ANONYMOUS RECEIPT No. 734743 4  $675.00 (9/16/2011)  EXHIBIT H     
d.      PLAINTIFFS’ ANONYMOUS RECEIPT No. 428788   $1,180.00 (11/1/2011) EXIBIT I

e.      PLAINTIFFS’ ANONYMOUS RECEIPT No.  428794    $170.00 (11/03/2011) EXHIBIT J

 Plaintiffs rejected check issued by a popular US base  Italian Restaurant (Carrabbas, Peabody, MA) and

                                                                                2
OFUME V. RST ET AL
Defendants have to travel to deposit the check into their own bank account off  jurisdiction.  History of Defendants’ payment shows that the Plaintiffs jumped into Court Eviction without reason and forged amount owing to steer sympathy before this honourable Court.

Whether there is sufficient Notice in accordance with 5th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States and  Bill of Rights and Tenancy with a Lease. The type of tenancy entered into between Plaintiffs and Defendants  is “A Tenant with a Lease.” This Lease has its own rule.

A.                                                    JURISDICTION


1.    Action of the Landlord/Plaintiffs is retaliation against  the lawful prior action of the CounterClaim Defendants when they lawfully proceeded to write to the landlords several letters (shortlisted and incorporated as EXHIBITS K, L,  requesting them to put the apartment to habitable standard and when they refused to fix the multiple defects, Defendants proceeded to file Complaints with the BOARD OF HEALTH (EXHIBITS B & C) and that the action of the Defendants is in normal  tune in good faith respecting the rights of the landlord and tenant in accordance with M.G.L. CHAPTER 23B, SECTION 30; M.G.L. CHAPTER 186 SEC. 18; M.G.L. CHAPTER 111; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SANITARY, CODE CHAPTER 11; MINIMUM STANDARDS OF FITNESS FOR HUMAN HABITATION; 105 CMR 410; 105 CMR 410.000; M.G.L. CHAPTER 239, SEC. 8A; 5th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States and also vested in Bill of Rights; Tenancy with a Lease (EXHIBIT D).

                                                                                                                                    
2.     The action of the defendants complies with the operating laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts cited in para 1 above and related legislation cited below including 105 CMR 410.


3.  Reliant  the horrible conditions  inside and outside the  apartment, the landlords do not merit any rent in accordance with M.G.L. CHAPTER 239, SEC. 8A and they acted contrary to M.G.L. c. 186, § 18 because as no rent was outstanding and  overdue, to the extent that the landlords received full and in possession of Defendants’ $1,350.00 and defects remain unfixed and the landlords are  in-charge of any utilities in the apartment, therefore the Land

4.     Under this arm-twisting  and imbalance tenancy, no recognition of Tenancy  with a Lease particularly lack of sufficient notice and eviction without with civil demand notice and intent to proceed to court and mandatory and other forms of notice to quit.

                                     COUNT # 1
                                                            3

OFUME V. RST ET AL

A.         PROOF OF ILLEGIBILITY TO RECEIPT OF RENT AND REASON THE TENANTS  OR COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS REFUSED TO PAY NOVEMBER 20, 2011 ET AL RENT PENDING THE DETERMINATION OF THIS ACTION.

                  Horrifying Conditions in the Apartment
5.   The Ofume family moved in  August 17, 2011 about 11.00 p.m.. Letters and personal meetings were made to request landlords to fix defect but plea remain unheeded.  

6.    All the defects stated below were inherited under rushed  and nowhere to live occupancy. Oral and written Complaints put to the landlords but they refused to fix the following major defects:

6.A.1.  Ofume family lives in apartment #2 and each time tenants in apartment #3 are bathing or using water there is pool of water coming down from the roof and flooding the Ofume family’s apartment particularly washroom and other spots of the apartment.

6.A.2.  Complainant or Ofume family is unable to bring in  furniture, rugs and other goods and  properties because of water drilling and something that looks like slime mold or fungus across the apartment which the family clean every 48 hours. The walls are easily blacken and with watery substances flowing out from the walls.

6.A.3     Some windows are unserviceable and prone to fall and one went down two day when the family moved into the apartment.

6.A. 4.  The family is in-charge of all utilities but there is no heat in apartment because 100% of the ancient transformers powered by gas are unserviceable and not working. Gas has been paid in full from month to month.          
                                          
7.A.5. .  Some doors have cracks and unserviceable including the front entrance door which requires new keys.
                                                            4

OFUME V. RST ET AL

8.A.6.   Majority of the fire alarms and carbon dioxide detector are not working;

9.A.7.  there are several bugs, cockroaches, rats, mice, and other animals;

10.A. 8.    Some of the transformers  inside and outside  living room are unserviceable to breakup and fall and one of thee Transformers can kill an adult .

11.A.  9.  Some of the transformers are unserviceable to the extent that they produce electrocution if touched.

12.A.10.    Refrigerator is leaking and produces water which the family must clean from time to time.

13.A.11.    Majority of the electric  bulbs high and low are uncovered and the light shines into the children and adult eyes.

14.A.12.  Several electric sockets are unserviceable and damaged for several years and with open current which could harm children and adult.

15. A.13.  Because of the horrible moldy conditions of the  majority of the rooms  of the apartment  including the living room, the family abandoned major part of the apartment. 

16.A.14.  Several occasion, the Ofume family has pleaded orally and in writing that the landlord find livable apartment for them but its plea remain unheeded by the landlord. 
etc.
                                        COUNT # 2
                                                                        5

OFUME V. RST ET AL

B.                   Statement of  Fact/Analysis of Mistreatment

17.B.1.    Complainant, Ofume family is a large family with seven children and two parents and 8 members reside at the apartment afore-underlined.

18.B.2.    Reason surrounding lead parent’s  Dr. Phillip C. Ofume’s bid for the President of Nigeria, 2007, 2011 and 2015 when no rent is owing  punitively his political opponents (sponsored by Anglo-Dutch Oil/Gas Companies and allies) have adopted  paid incessant poor housing, homelessness and harsh economic persecution as tools to disrupt his campaign.  These political opponents influenced the landlords, courts. utilities, district, county, state and federal governments’ agencies and private sectors service providers.  See Ofume v. George W. Bush et al – The Supreme Court of United States Docket No  08-8873  http://groups.google.com/group/soc.org.nonprofit/browse_thread/thread/cf9abb1 be2edefa7?pli=1

B.3.     From long exhaustive and high costs stay  hotel to hotel, apartment located at 96 Walnut Street Brockton, MA was negotiated for over two weeks and the landlord having been told the desperate conditions of the Ofume family to get apartment immediately, the landlord refused to bear burden  of any part of the utilities. 100% of the utilities were pushed to the Ofume family. 

B.4.    From place to place after the Ofume family has negotiated with landlords and other agents and paid advance, few hours time these , political opponents who carry bags of money up and down  will influence them and they will telephone the family to deny the family’s application without reason.

B.5.   Some of the landlords and real estates agents influenced are as follows: 
-    Mayberry Communities Apartment Management (Park Street Lynn, MA): Apt for rent - 10 Lawton Avenue, Apt. # 1 Lynn, MA 01904

-     111 Foster Street  Peabody, MA Tel. 978-771-0373

-       145-135 Ward Street Revere, MA  - returned deposit

-   Claudel Jeannot, 1 White Oak Drive, Nashua, NH 03063  Apt. located at 34 Shermam St. Peabody  Tel/Fax 1-9783302860
                                                            6
OFUME V. RST ET AL

Etc.                             
C.            AGREED  MOVE IN DATE  AUGUST 16, 2011     


  
C.1.       On August  13, 2011 negotiation for  96 Walnut Street Brockton, MA was finalized ($1,300.00 without utilities) and $2,640.00 (TWO THOUSANDS SIX HUNDRED AND FORTY US DOLLARS) was demanded by the landlord and the Ofume family who was drifting towards 7th politicized homelessness did not question the request and the family paid in full and questionable two  payment receipts for $2600.00 and $40.00 without the corporate and other names of the company (now after move in suspect  disclosed and identified as “RST Investment Company and Landlord Connection”. The move in date was August 16, 2011. The family thought that the anonymous receipt thing was DIRECT scam on the family.

C.2.    On August 16, 2011 the family checkout from the hotel and  arrived in the landlord’s  office at about 9.00 p.m.  to move in (96 Walnut Street Brockton, MA)  and the landlord told the family that he is no longer going to take  $1,300.00 without utilities and that the last amount  he will take per month will be $1,350.00 (ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS).

C. 3.  On August 16, 2011 the landlord  has done a good psychotherapy on the family to the extent that the landlord had in mind  via using his staff to question the family’s cash strength after spending so much on hotel bills. The family was forced to add additional $100.00 for first and last month rents.

C. 4.   On August 16, 2011 as the time continued to move towards 10.15 p.m. the landlord and staff broke another terrible news that they will not rent out 96 Walnut Street Brockton, MA to the family and that they have  another apartment and the family should accompany  their staff to the apartment located at 506 Warren Avenue, Apt. #2 Brockton, MA .

C.5.    Upon  entering the apartment and entering the  toilet was blocked with pieces of paper, cigarettes, crumbs of food, etc;  smelling and highly dirty apartment, family’s children started crying because they were several mice/rats, cockroaches and other bugs running up and down across their feet.  

C. 6.   Because the premises is bushy and dirty and inside the apartment was more scaring , the  family was overwhelmed with the fear of snake and other harmful creatures.  The family decided to go back to hotel because the staff of the landlord promised that they will do the cleaning before  7.00 pm on August

                                                            7
OFUME V. RST ET AL

17, 2011.


C. 7.  On  August 17, 2011 the family arrived at about  11.00 p.m. and opened the apartment and no cleaning was done. The family  moved in and they  mobilized  themselves to do several walls, floor, window, toilet, public or all tenants  staircase, bath, etc cleaning s and this routine continues  time to time to make the apartment somehow livable.

C. 8.   After several contacts including  writing  to the landlord and nothing was fixed, the family telephoned the Mayor’s Office (Board of Health)  and requested for inspection. The day one lady called Monica told the family that the Inspector will come earned disappointment. The family waited all day and the inspector did not come.

D.                                               RELIEF
Plaintiffs’ action against the Defendants be dismissed with costs more than the sum of the yearly lease ($16,200.00) added to special and general damages ($25,000.00)  be paid in full to the Defendants.


_______________________
Dr. Phillip C. Ofume & Co.
 P.O. Box 2416                                                                                                                                                     Lynn, MA 01903
Tel. (781) 479-9027,                                                                                                                                       E-mail:
limptintinc@gamail.com
            

BROCKTON HIGH SCHOOL, HOLYOKE HIGH SCHOOL AND LYNN CLASSICAL HIGH SCHOOL : COMPLAINT ON MISCONDUCT WHICH OBSTRUCTS LEARNING AND RTENTION

 RELEASE ORDERED IMMEDIATELY

BROCKTON HIGH SCHOOL, HOLYOKE HIGH SCHOOL AND LYNN CLASSICAL HIGH SCHOOL : COMPLAINT ON MISCONDUCT WHICH OBSTRUCTS LEARNING AND RTENTION

These are mainstream urban schools with america's non legislated urban school rules and regulations. Hon. secretaries (federal and state) are aware of these unofficial rules and regulation. Urban schools with non-whites majority but  with over 98%  whites and mounted 99% white police system to shut up the rights of the students under outrageous poor teaching and teachers. Superintendents are whites and unable control misconducts. FBI is requested to open investigation  immediately.


Further readings:

http://universal-fashion-art-music.blogspot.com/2011/11/exactly-meaning-of-occupy-protest-and.html

______________________________________________________________________________

HRRG, IHRRC, LIMPT, INC. & ASSOCIATES
(EDUCATION & WORKFORCE PROJECT -  USA CHAPTER)
c/o Dr. Phillip C. Ofume
P. O. Box 2416
Lynn, MA 01903
Tel.  857-266-2253/781-479-9027
E-mail: limptintinc@gmail.com
globalaids_hivcureinteraction@yahoo.co.uk
humanrights.researchgroup@gmail.com

_____________________________________________________________________

Our Ref. Ofu.F./IHRRGC-LIMPT&A./11/11/CDN/96812      Date: November 18, 2011


DELIVERED BY HAND, E-MAIL/MAILBOX & REGULAR MAILS

Attention: Federal and State Hon. Secretaries of Education, Inspector General of Education, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Superintendents/Deputy Superintendents, Principals, Teachers, Administrators,  Guidance Counselors, UNHCR, UNHCHR, UNESCO, US universities, U.S. Human Rights Commission (State/Federal Departments of Education), etc.

                                           COMPLAINT

HOLYOKE HIGH SCHOOL, CLASSICAL HIGH SCHOOL, AND BROCKTON HIGH SCHOOL : CONSPIRED OUTRAGE OF TEST/EXAMS SCORES/TRANSCRIPTS FORGERY; HORRIFYING MALPRACTICES; FRAUD; ETC. – CALL TO REOPEN FURTHER INVESTIGATION AT HOLYOKE HIGH SCHOOL, CLASSICAL HIGH SCHOOL, AND BROCKTON HIGH SCHOOL
Re. Ms. Isabelle Ifeoma Ofume Grade 12



Isabelle Ofume is aspiring to study medicine; Holyoke High School, Lynn Classical High School and Brockton High School are paid to disrupt her aspiration. Summary of this assignment and what they have achieved so far is as follows:





A.             FORGED SCORES, TRANSCRIPTS AND PROGRESS REPORT; FALSIFIED SCORES ON UNCOMPLETED TEST, ASSIGNMENT AND UNDONE TESTS AND COURSES - HOLYOKE HIGH SCHOOL, CLASSICAL HIGH SCHOOL, AND BROCKTON HIGH SCHOOL


 Shortlist of how the forgery, malpractices, fraud, etc were organized and implemented to reduce Ms. Isabelle Ofume’s scores and as route to impede her interest to study medicine:

Important Notice:

Because of the suspected long journey of this case, to facilitate discovery examination, we further request all teachers and administrators at  HOLYOKE HIGH SCHOOL, CLASSICAL HIGH SCHOOL, AND BROCKTON HIGH SCHOOL to keep question/answer sheets and scores on all students’ (including student victim, Isabelle Ofume’s) assignments, tests and examinations. Certified copies be sent to the Superintendents and Hon. Secretaries of the Departments of Education (state/federal).




Case 1

1.     Isabelle Ofume’s Brockton High School Transcripts to U.S. Universities:  Isabelle’s Transcripts which Brockton High School intends to send to U.S. Universities on behalf Isabelle Ofume on November 17, 2011, show that officials at  HOLYOKE HIGH SCHOOL, CLASSICAL HIGH SCHOOL, AND BROCKTON HIGH SCHOOL met in concert to falsify the transcripts because they matched wide array of self-created scores which were scored zero and with several deliberate mistakes all of which will lead to automatic denial of admission at all US universities. With high ego of animosity, zeros were entered without computation of scores earned.


Case # 2

2.    On November 17, 2011 the Guidance Counselor tried to disassociate herself with this complicity which she observed from time to time without taken action to advice the teachers. Over two months, we have written and telephoned the counselor and Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent  unfolding the  conduct of the teachers and the relationships between Brockton High School and Classical High School and Holyoke High School but  Brockton High School continued its  anti-federal law practices such as not providing catch up and other resources to facilitate the integration of migrant students; overloading new migrant student with past works including heavy summer work and past state examination which would have been matched under accrual of credits. This plan is put in place to overwork Isabelle and distract her focus on on-going courses in order to get more and more low scores to block her chance to study medicine.


Case # 3

3.    Referencing para 2 above, for example in the State of Virginia (Richmond) there is grade 10 state examination similar to grade 10 MCAS in Massachusetts. Isabelle did similar  examination (grade 10) called SOL in Virginia. Under this conspiracy, to get low score soon as Isabelle arrived and registered at Brockton High School, the director of Azure House and the Counselor created serial harassment bang in which they interrogate Isabelle from time to time before during and after lecture by warning her that should she fails to do grade 10 MCAS that she will not graduate. The guidance counselor has removed Isabelle from middle of teaching  purposely to say, “you must do grade 10 MCAS or you are not graduating.” Is this sufficient to remove student from  an on-going class remarkably calculus?  

 Case  #4

4.      Per above mentioned falsification of transcripts, we were taught by past experiences in dealing with the resistance of U.S. whites in providing lucrative and other education to non-whites and the set unconstitutional measures blocking them from looking up to enroll at universities which are claimed  as learning corners for only whites and community colleges are dumps  for non-white. For example, in 2006 the guidance counselor at Classical High School prepared fictitious school transcripts for Mr. Kleber Odimegwu Ofume to Suffolk University (admission office), Boston, MA and sealed the envelope without allowing Kleber to see the content and added serious warning that Kleber MUST not open the envelope. During the contact with the dean of admission, Dr. Ofume was informed that the enclosures were not school transcripts. Effective this ugly experience, we (IHRRG/IHRRC/ASSOCIATES) decided to make sure we deliver transcripts by hand and request the receiving admission officer to open the envelope instantly.  Long distance submissions were done by acknowledgement of receipt and exchange of the stamped copies of all the documents received by the universities. Also we decided under  the Amendment to the Constitution and Bill of Rights of the United States to request that school disclosure transcripts and providing extra-copies for us and we must deliver the  sealed transcript package to the admission office by hand or courier.

Case  #5

5.     Lynn Classical High School and Salem State University, Salem, MA – DUAL ENROLLMENT PROGRAM (DEP): Under this chain conspiracy to stop Isabelle from studying medicine, because of the foregoing and below summarized fictitious and disruptive score assignment  by Holyoke High School and Lynn Classical High School, Isabelle applied for the DEP (Summer 2011)  to makeup certain conspired diminished scores and GPA. Lynn Classical High School in bad faith collaborated  with Salem State University to remove the  courses from Summer holidays 2011 to Fall school year 2011 which is  main school year season when Isabelle may or may not have time to do the DEP courses. Salem State University refused to honor appointment to discuss reason for removal of the DEP summer course to fall school year and content of the package which was sent by the Guidance Counselor. Isabelle relocated to Brockton, MA and to enable her do the DEP courses, Isabelle applied for transportation to from Salem State University/ Brockton, MA; the application for transportation was denied for no just reason under NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT (2001) and related education legislation.  


Case # 6

6.   English/Teacher: Because in this urban school (predominantly non-white school) three absents earned student zero even if he/she made A/B+ during attendance days. Is this the practice in suburban schools? To make up three absents English teacher forged absent date to assign zero whereas the date claimed by the teacher, Isabelle was in her class and other classes in the school.  Summer work which Isabelle is not supposed to do maybe because of fear of heavily armed and mounted police,  Isabelle  acted under force and  started to read the large books (over 600 pages per book) and same heavy books/reading/assignment in other courses and in English (and)  as the assignment has not been completed instead of entering incomplete or pending  on the progress report, she entered another zero.





Case # 7

7.   European History/Teacher:  To get low scores  the teacher under-scored Isabelle and we request comparative work and score but this teacher and others declined and irresponsive to our request for discovery.  In other plan to get low scores, the teacher  imposed heavy summer work and overloaded Isabelle with heavy on-going work without catch up program for new or migrant student (Isabelle).


Case # 8

8.      Pre-Calculus class/teacher: The teacher is weak and unable to teach the course.  Under this paid conspiracy, the target is Isabelle and  to get low score, the teacher gave the class over sixty calculus questions and gave the students less than 1 hour to complete the questions which must be done by long demonstration before arriving at an answer. None of the students finished the questions and she refused to grant extra-time. In all schools here and there, this test must be scored as INCOMPLETE but she scored Isabelle  zero in place of INCOMPLETE and she did not score several questions she was able to complete and had correct answers. Discovery shows that all teachers had preference for their preferred students.

Case # 9

9.     Further conspiracy between  Holyoke High School, Lynn Classical High School and Brockton High School:  Honor Algebra II, AP British Literature, Honors Chemistry, AP US History - poor teaching, unfinished exams, incomplete grades because of the removal of Isabelle Ofume  and siblings  by the Department of Children and Families (DCF) and follow-up incident which is now the subject of the matter, Ofume et al v. Department of Children and Families (DCF), Holyoke Police Department et al, (Brockton Superior Court) DCF and Holyoke Police Department interrupted the test, exams and completion of the courses. Parents petitioned Under this conspiracy, without the consent of parents and allowing the investigation by the Department of Education and FBI to complete their investigation, at close door, Classical High School relied on these incomplete tests, exams and courses to match the high scores which she earned at Classical High School and brought the scores to low scores.  See http://universal-fashion-art-music.blogspot.com/2011/11/brockton-sup-court-department-ofume-v.html


Case  #10
10.    Brockton High School: Refused to issue free meal letters to all Isabelle Ofume to impede her admission process such as matriculation test which Isabelle must take by waiver because Isabelle and parents fall under district, county, state and federal poverty level. Issuance of  waiver slip or letter to Isabelle to enable her complete SAT/ACT registrations was denied and granted over two months after deadline. This registration is the last chance for Isabelle to complete her university admission process. Isabelle was starved by Brockton High School for over two months. See income conditions of Isabelle and her parents and siblings as to whether she’s qualified for reduced or free breakfast and launch. Lower court to highest law courts of the United States and other agencies granted waiver to Isabelle and her parents/siblings.

Cases # 11 to 12
SUPERINTENDENTS/DEPUTIES -  HOLYOKE HIGH SCHOOL, CLASSICAL HIGH SCHOOL, AND BROCKTON HIGH SCHOOL
 

11.    They maybe ready to resolve the matter or do not know how to set up resolution, the straw is that the teachers are in control and lack respect for the superintendents and their deputies. To the Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent of Brockton Public Schools, detail information was put to them  to crack the chain paid lobby conducted by  Holyoke High School passing through Classical High School to Brockton High School. At Lynn Classical High School, first day in a meeting on behalf the Ofume family between our representatives and staff (Course syllabus Guidance Counselor ) of the Lynn Classical High School, suddenly the principal brain washed by the moneyed people at Holyoke High School, disrespectfully removed the Guidance Counselor from the meeting without apology to our representative.   End of the meeting between the Guidance Counselor and the Principal showed that Holyoke High School and Holyoke Public School have captured and influenced the Principal of Lynn Classical High School and he ignored and disrespected federal education Acts and other regulations in support of NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT (2001) and  the admission offered Isabelle by the Superintendent of the Lynn Public School, Dr. Catherine Latham. Under personal interest, the Principal of Classical High School without consent of Isabelle’s parents, demanded for  disputed scores from Holyoke High School and used the schools to lower down each high scores, Isabelle earned at Classical High School.


12.     The assignments which Holyoke High School gave to Classical High School and  Brockton High School  are to use the Holyoke High School scores which are under investigation by the federal and state Departments of Education and FBI to lower the emerging scores in their school (Lynn Classical High School), apply workload by past work or pre-arrival work to overload on-going work in the on-going classes and to rush her into tests and examination on courses which the teachers did not teach her,  and thereafter to get several under scores to put her GPA down. Principal of Classical High School used the appealed results at Holyoke High School to reduce all the A/B+ to F/D. Petitioned to the Hon. Secretaries of the state/federal Departments of Education.


Cases 13 - 17

                      Legislative Body and Jurisdiction of Complaint


13.      Holyoke High School, Classical High School and Brockton High School  and  Student, victim: Re.  Ms.  Isabelle Ifeoma Ofume Grade 12 (Canada and United States). September 2010 – present, we have written to all the recipients concerned in part mentioned above and schools without action taken in all the circumstances.  All these schools remain in opposition to federal laws including charging and demanding school supply money from poor students who are  below district/county/state/federal poverty level; No Child Left Behind Act (2001); several poor students are charged money for breakfast and launch which is tactical unofficial policy to deny them waiver for several matriculation and non-matriculation paid  examinations and related rights under NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT; etc.

“The Migrant Student Information Exchange (MSIX) …to ensure the appropriate enrollment, placement, and accrual of credits for migrant children nationwide and the goals of MSIX are stated under section 1308 (b) (2) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, requires the Secretary to ensure the linkage of migrant student record systems for the purpose of electronically exchanging, among the States, health and educational information regarding all migratory students.”

14.     To deny urban and mixed urban non-whites rights to education, the Migrant Student Information Exchange (MSIX) is flagrantly breached. For example, excellent Grade 1-10 results with A and B+  which Isabelle earned  from one of the best schools in the United States and Canada (Riverbend High School, Fredericksburg, VA, Bedford South School, Bedford, Nova Scotia Canada B4A 4B6, ) were not accepted and in place the Principal and Vice-Principal of Lynn Classical High School who played role in Kleber Ofume’s case (2006) relied on the results (undecided complaint)  falsified and issued by one of the worst and poorest high schools in the United States (Holyoke High School) to establish Isabelle’s scores and GPA and bring it down to level of denial in any U.S. universities. Holyoke High School’s  results were falsified and imposed on Isabelle and  collated  from uncompleted courses, assignments, tests and examinations because of the disruption of her education at Holyoke High School by the Department of Children and Families (DCF) and Holyoke Police Department ( HPD). The courses, assignments, tests and examinations were not completed before Isabelle and her parents and siblings relocated to Lynn, MA. Heartlessly, the teachers, counselors and administrators  at Holyoke High School scored all the uncompleted courses, assignments, tests and examinations and issued zero. Principal of Classical High School added these F/Ds to downgrade all the completed courses, assignments, tests and examination at Lynn Classical High School which she A/B+. Isabelle spent about three months at Holyoke High School under poor teaching and assignments, tests and examinations by raw or untaught courses to get underscores and low scores. Rejecting results from best schools and prefer poor schools is questionable and actionable because the action stains the wellness of education and just assessment and evaluation of the process of learning and earning the benefits of education in the United States.  




15.      In-between time during the investigation following our present and past petitions on the poor teaching and failing grades of students, Holyoke High School made a sidewalk by bad faith collaboration with Classical High School and Brockton High School in defence to get further fund from the departments of education and others to the extent of trying to justify that the failing scores issued to Ms. Isabelle Ofume were made in good faith because it resurfaced in other two high schools. Before this frame up Holyoke High School removed grades 1-10 on which Isabelle maintained Honor/High Honor/A/A+/B+ and connived with the apartment owner (NEW ENGLAND FARM WORKERS COUNCIL) to seize several copies of these high grades and honors (http://www.law.cornell.edu/ supct/html/042709.ZOR.html; http://universal-fashion-art-music.blogspot.com/2011/11/brockton-sup-court-department-ofume-v.html



16.          To use learning and failing grade history to justify the conduct of weak teachers and teaching at Holyoke High School which were experienced in grade 11 and part of grade 12 in poor urban schools,  Classical High School and Brockton High School were lobbied and adopted into the business to do two harms, using failing grade to justify the low standard of education at Holyoke High School and convince state and federal Departments of Education that Isabelle who has maintained A/A+/B+/Honor/High Honor 1- 10 is a weak student. How will only the fraudulent action of teachers and administrators in these poor schools ( grade 11 and less than three months of  grade12) downgrade these outstanding assiduities and convince any just court of law and investigator that such student is weak.


17.           In the United States outlook of medicine and its practice appears like a reservation for only whites and the indentured part of the profession is for non-whites and few less educated whites. Do what we did by going from medical school to medical school and thereafter, medical workplace to medical workplace across the United States. The shock you will get is in issue, whether America is truly and genuinely multi-cultural/racial /ethnic/color federation in delivery of services from her Commonwealth.

General comment – mandate of urban/mixed urban schools:
With the believe that Holyoke is a place with predominantly non-white urban city without civil liberty group and parents that are not able to defend their children and  where several bad things are active and the High School and other typical public urban schools are run by over 98% white teachers/administrators hired to implement  learner disorientation and dropout and to block turnout and clean up opponents to white competitor in labor market.


Initially, Holyoke High School and its public schools were adopted to implement the action to stop Ms. Isabelle Ofume's interest in pursuing medical career. Canada through US grades 1 - 10 and part of grade 11 she has prepared herself to study medicine. To disrupt her interest, the tools are poor teachers/teaching; test/exams/assignment by untaught or raw courses; work overload compounded with two or more forms of work overload (past summer and other works without remediation) all which are design and put in place to get failing scores; after several poor teaching, one back or five to seven backward, are secretly selection and less than 24 hours notice is given to the students to do test/examination with back mind intention to get low scores. Only students who are teachers’ errand boys and girls get direct information of the topic to be tested or examined; etc. In urban and mixed urban schools, administrators and the Hon. Secretaries of the Departments of Education are aware of these internal activities.


Respectfully submitted,
For:  IHRRG, IHRRC, LIMPT, INC. & ASSOCIATES
(EDUCATION & WORKFORCE PROJECT -  USA CHAPTER)




 _________________________________________________

Phillip  C. Ofume, Ph.D. Chair, National & International Policy Research
Council; Head, Law Reform and Litigation and Security Policy Council;
Candidate in Exile - Nigeria's Presidential Election 2015; National
Chair, Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association -Anti-Racism
Committee (p);  Nominee for the National President of the American                                                                    Association  for  Affirmative Action (AAAA)  2012 ; National Coordinator, LIMPT, INC.

Godson Etiebet, Ph.D. Researcher, (Policy/Good Government) National
and International Policy Research Council Coordinator, Europe Section,
Switzerland

Cynthia H. Taylor, Ph.D./Alh. (Dr.) Farruk Mohammad Strategic
Development Researchers - International Policy Research Council,
Middle East Project


Tan Ochollu, D.Lit. Principal Researcher, (Strategic Development)
National and International Policy Research Council Director of Asia
Project


Reid MacDonald, Ph.D. Coordinator, North America Section


Kris Kifindi Bunkheti, Ph.D. - Sept 2007 - present continued to be
detained/imprisoned by the PM of Canada Stephen Harper Researcher
(Language/Culture), National and International Policy Research Council
York University (Department of History - Engaged in Ant-slavery/Slavery/Abolitionist Controversies ) Toronto, Ontario Canada (p)


Jerome Tesfai, D. Min/Div Principal Researcher, Policy and Practice in
Government and Foreign Interveners - Africa Project

Francois Bourgeois/Pierre Bushel
International Human Rights Watch and Democracy - St. Etienne, France