Showing posts sorted by relevance for query DCF. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query DCF. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AGAINST CLERK/MAGISTRATE: BROCKTON SUPERIOR COURT - ABUSE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AGAINST CLERK/MAGISTRATE: BROCKTON SUPERIOR COURT - ABUSE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

__________________________________________________________________________

RELEASE ORDERED IMMEDIATELY

HRRG, IHRRC, LIMPT, INC. & ASSOCIATES
(EDUCATION & WORKFORCE PROJECT -  USA CHAPTER)
c/o Dr. Phillip C. Ofume
P. O. Box 2416
Lynn, MA 01903
Tel.  857-266-2253/781-479-9027
E-mail: limptintinc@gmail.com
globalaids_hivcureinteraction@yahoo.co.uk
humanrights.researchgroup@gmail.com

_____________________________________________________________________


Our Ref. Ofu.F./IHRRGC-LIMPT&A./11-11/Letter/9887         Date: November 25, 2011

Executive Director
MA Complaint Against Clerk/Magistrate
Committee on Professional Responsibility for Clerks of the Court
John Adam Courthouse,
One Pembertom Square
Boston, MA 02108

Complainant's Name/Address:  Dr. Phillip Chukwuma  Ofume, 506 Warren Avenue, Brockton, MA 02301 Tel. 781-479-9027 ofume.phillip@gmail.com


Respondent's Name:  Clerk/Magistrate of Brockton Supwerior Court, 72 Belmont St Ste 1 Brockton, MA 02301 (508) 583-8250. Court staff and Clerk/Magistate gave different names. On Plymonth Superior Court Department which the umbrella, Complainant unable to select his name.

                                             COMPLAINT

A.                                           SUMMARY


1.     In this complaint, The Hon. Justice Jeffrey A. Locke works with the Clerk/Magistrate of the Brockton Superior Court, Brockton, MA to sanction and demobilize Complainant's four different lawsuits in which two of the four cases will prevent six Black Children and two Black parents from homelessness, loss of education, starvation and removal of these children by criminals  (DCF/DSS and its child vendor clients).  Judge Locke was former Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families(DCF) or Department of Social Services (DSS).


2.         Under outside manipulation, the Clerk/Magistrate has impounded three most important, urgent and life saving cases of the four cases filed with Brockton Superior Court. In the other front, the Assistant Court Clerks have been searching for these two cases  of the three cases without success because the Clerk/Magistrate must have kept them  in unseen place or took the case files to his home or to his sponsors to get favor.


3.      Restating in contest that Judge Locke was former Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families(DCF) or Department of Social Services (DSS). Social services in the United States  include but unlimited to Adoption of Children, Foster Kid program, Orphage program, child benefits, housing, food stamps, cash benefit, families and homeless shelters,  etc. The defendants in Complainant's four different and unrelated lawsuits are DCF/DSS and its staffs, Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), Department of Transitional Assistance (DTA), Holyoke Police Department (HPD), utility companies, education, etc. In the United States, in major part, these agencies and companies supported by courts/police are threat to talented/smart/gifted/A  /A+/B+ non-white children/families, and  non-white educated, professionals, investors and related group. The Judge and Clerk/Magistrate are whites and in these cases they are working hard to see that these children are removed by the DCF and family and parents are destroyed.


4.        Complainant filed four different and unrelated Complaints with Brockton Superior Court. Clerk/Magistrate of this Court, hide three complaints among which are two most urgent complaints which were filed to be held under emergency to enable defendant (Department of Housing and Community Development -DHCD)  transfer unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton, MA to enable Complainant use the unused seven months shelter benefits to stop the politicized Notice of Eviction now placed on FAST Summary Process Trial to evict Complainant and his family to enable DCF re-seize Complainant's children to do three major harms such as disrupt Complainant's Campaign for the President of Nigeria 2015, seize Complainant's children to disorganize the family or stop the criminal investigation in Canada which involves theft of over $150,000.00 of the Complainant's children benefits (2005 - present) and obstruct AAAA campaign for President 2012 because Complainant is strong Nominee for the National President of  The American Association for Affirmation Action (AAAA).


5.            In Brockton Superior Court, The Hon. Justice Jeffrey A. Locke and Clerk/Magistrate connived together  to implement severe forms of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE under vicious extra-process/procedural malpractice via Conflict of Interest, to the extent that the major defendants are Department of Children and Families (DCF) and its staff, to the extent that Judge Locke is former Commissioner of DCF and openly defending DCF in open Court and sanctioning Complainant from filing lawsuits against his former employer, DCF; to the extent that action of Judge Locke clearly and avertly  identifies support for the persecutory action of DCF against Complainant and other uglier action of Complainant's political rivals;  to the extent that they (rivals) have used rush court eviction /homelessness, seizure of Complainant's children by DCF and economic sanction/ persecution as tools to distabilize Complainant's campaign for the President of Nigeria 2015; to the extent that  the following cases which will  stop seizure of Complainant's children via eviction /homelessness and harsh economic  sanction and persecution have been sanctioned and placed in a hiden place and the assistant clerks have searched for the most important two cases (b and d below); to the extent that Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate have sanctioned the three emergency lawsuits that would stop these paid political action; to the extent that these three cases are summarized as follows b, c. and d );   to the extent that the Eviction Summary Proceedings before the Brockton Housing Court is returnable for December 7, 2011 and this rush eviction/homelessness is the 8th in less than two years;  and to the extent that  in SECRET COURTROOM Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate made mockery of Complainant and consolidated these different cases and called them one case and issued one docket number 11-126A to the four different and unrelated cases  and ordered that summons not be issued to three in which two of the three are most important to save the terrible irreparable harms listed below and above.

6.   The four Cases and cause of action are as follows:  


a. Police arrest, improper and punitive handcuff, parade of children and adult before the public, charges, and prosecution - Holyoke Police Department (HPD) et a. l Phillip Ofume v. HPD Docket No. ?

b.  Transfer of family unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton - Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) - Phillip Ofume v. DHCD Docket No.  ?

c.  Unlawful impounding, seizure, confiscation  and possession of properties and goods valued over $60million belonging to Dr. Phillip C. Ofume and Mrs. Maureen N. Ofume and their children and NGOs -Phillip Ofume v. DCF et al Docket No. 11- 1260

d.   Payment of child and adult benefits - DTA.  Phillip Ofume v. DTA Docket No. ?
                                             

 B.                                                            FACT

7.              The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke  was  former Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families (DCF) or Department of Social Services (DSS).  Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate have created obstructive consolidation of four different and unrelated cases to obstruct justice and waive burden of adverse decision on Judge Locke's former check cutter or employer (DCF/DSS).



8.            Unofficially and officially, directly and indirectly, all the defendants/respondents mentioned in paragraph 1 above are connected by several corruptive ways such as color, race, political affiliation, etc. DCF and its staff are lead defendants in two of the four lawsuits. The two  cases listed as b and d are sanctioned by the Judge and Clerk/Magistrate to enable eviction/homelessness take place to enable seizure of children occur. These agencies and related service providers ( mayors, court/Judges, DCF/DSS, DHCD, DTA, police/sheriff, etc) have worked together under the clout of color, race and extended  politics to implement these incesant homelessness and brutal economic sanction/persecution path to re-seize Complainant's children which is not mentioned in this Complaint to the extent that there is an on-going case in Canada   of the theft of over $150,000.00 of Complainant's children benefits  which they want to sweep under the rug by re-seizing these children and eliminating other benefitiaries or parents (see the disclosure of the Government of Canada on this theft).  



9.   Effective October 25, 2011 Clerk/Magistrate started receiving these four lawsuits and impounded and seized them and either takes them home or keeps them in hidden location where assistant clerks and other court staff will not locate the case files. Complainant/Plaintiff has visited the clerk's office several times and called for his file. Remarkably two  staff have tried to find the case files in place where majority/minority of the case files are kept but they failed to find the files.


10.     Three ( Ofume v. DHCD,  Ofume v. DCF et al and Ofume v. DTA)  of the four cases are cases of less than 48 hours emergency to single Judge and taken by The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke. These cases are emergency  because DCF and other calloborators  have setup another plot to again and again use Eviction and homelessness to re-seize Complainant/Plaintiff's children as they did on January 31, 2011 and custody restated on February 8, 2011 by Order of Judge presiding in the Holyoke Juvenile Court.


11.     Judge Jeffrey and Clerk/Magistrate of the Brockton Superior Court have censored docketing and hearing of the emergency complaint, Ofume v. DHCD which is Emergency Complaint seeking short Order in nature of commanding DHCD to transfer Complainant's over seven months unused family shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton to enable Complainant and his family continue the rent at their apartment in Brockton which was politically placed under summary eviction proceedings in Brockton District Court (Housing Division) on October 27, 2011.  Notwithstanding that no rent was owing under USCIS Nebraska Service Center politically motivated delay to approve Complainant and his family's EAD  and application for renewal of EAD which was made since January 1, 2011 early  enough for EAD which will expire on April 29, 2011. USCIS  joined Judges, Clerk/Magistrate, courts, DHCD, DTA, landlords, etc to  sanction right to work and right to other services including right to file cases in Court, etc. and put income of this family at $0.00.


12.    August 2009 - present, Plaintiff and his family have suffered 7 evictions and several homelessness and 8th plot is about to occur.  Judge Jeffrey and Clerk/Magistrate are delaying Complainant's emergency complaint (Ofume v. DHCD) to enable Brockton District Court (Housing Division) issue EVICTION ORDER against the Complainant and his family to enable DCF re-seize the children of the Complainant.


13.   Another important emergency Complaint censored by the Clerk/Magistrate is  Ofume v. DTA and Ofume v. DCF et al. Ofume v. DTA is requesting this court to order DTA to pay benefits  (food stamps, cash benefit, etc) to Plaintiff/Complainant's children and adults pending issuance of Employment Authorization Document (EAD) by the USCIS, Nebraska Service Center and employment. At present, the income of the family is $0.00/month. Across the United States these are the secret actions of the DCF/DSS designed to seize the children of non-whites and others profiled which setting affloat this plot DCF/DSS accuses them as being unable in task to provide for their children or family.



14.   In the court proceedings, Judge Jeffrey acts like Commissioner of DCF/DSS and he disbelieves Complainant and believed  DCF and other defendants. For example during full court costs hearing, to have free day in branding Complainant liar and throwing full support for  DCF  the Clerk and Judge Locke tactically evacuated the courtroom to create SECRET COURTROOM. After removing attorneys and others in the courtroom, one attorney stayed in to know what's up but the clerk/magistrate carefully removed him and  Judge Locke rose to enable complete evacuation occur before the court backup for the secret  hearing of Complainant/Plaintiff's cases.

15.     Effective October 25, 2011 Dr. Phillip Chukwuma Ofume filed four (4) different lawsuits against DCF, Holyoke Police Department, DCF and Staffs of DCF, Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistance (DTA) and New England Farm Workers Council (NEFWC) and its Staff


16.     These four different and unrelated cases filed with the Brockton Supewrior Court and only one Complaint  which not is important at this material time has been assigned Docket Number 11-1260.  Restating that two cases ( b and d) of the four complaints or cases require less than 48 hours emergency hearing and order to enable defendants transfer unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton and issue temporary vouchers to stop politicized court eviction which is politically designed to re-seize Complainant's children. To properly understand that the presiding Judge  is more of  DCF/DSS Commissioner in court, he sanctioned  the two cases that will prevent six Black Children and two Black parents from homelessness, loss of education, starvation and removal of these children by criminals  (DCF/DSS and its child vendor clients). In the other front, the Assistant Court Clerks have been searching for these two cases without success because the Clerk/Magistrate must have kept in unseen place or took the case files to his home or to his sponsors to get favor.


 17.     In two proceedings Judge Locke encountered enormous difficulty and unable to act or rule against DCF/DSS. The Clerk of Court is informant and  errand runner to/from Judge Locke and he (Clerk) hijacked and censored  three major complaints which are urgent tools to stop 8th politicized eviction/homelessness in less than two years. Soon after and started campaigning for consolidation of all the four (4) different and unrelated complaints .


18.     Complainant strongly Objects to Consolidation because it is designed to obstruct justice, delay the complaints to facilitate issuance of eviction order, hasten removal of children by the defendants:      These are four different and unrelated  cases and summarized by fact/evidence of Cause of Action as follows:
When Plaintiff asked  Judge Locke to explain why these cases must be consolidated, Judge Locke said nothing.


Consolidation will destroy and obstruct intended justice in these four different and unrelated lawsuits:


a. Police arrest, improper and punitive handcuff, parade of children and adult before the public, charges, and prosecution - Holyoke Police Department (HPD) et a. l Phillip Ofume v. HPD Docket No. ?


b.  Transfer of family unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton - Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) - Phillip Ofume v. DHCD Docket No.  ?

c.  Unlawful impounding, seizure, confiscation  and possession of properties and goods valued over $60million belonging to Dr. Phillip C. Ofume and Mrs. Maureen N. Ofume and their children and NGOs -Phillip Ofume v. DCF et al Docket No. 11- 1260


d.   Payment of child and adult benefits - DTA.  Phillip Ofume v. DTA Docket No. ?

 

                                       Conclusion/Relief


Very Urgent, Complainant request   removal  of the Clerk/Magistrate  from the Complainant's four (4) lawsuits filed with this Court starting from October 25, 2011 because of associational conflict of interest, questionable mindset which impedes the ability of the Judge and Clerk/Magistrate to act judiciously and in good faith, Clerk/Magistrate deceived the Judge and proposed consolidation of these four cases because of personal interest,  prevent consolidation of these  four different and unrelated cases which aim to brew obstruction of justice, urgent consideration of emergency fact/evidence to stop the plot mentioned above by recommending urgent action,  action of the Clerk/Magistrate  will lead to obstruction of intended justice against public interest and leading Complainant and his family to suffer expanded irreparable harm.  

 Respectfully submitted,

For:  IHRRG, IHRRC, LIMPT, INC. & ASSOCIATES
(EDUCATION & WORKFORCE PROJECT -  USA CHAPTER)

____________________
Phillip  C. Ofume, Ph.D
Complainant and National Coordinator
506 Warren Avenue #2 Brockton, MA  02301 Tel. 781-479-9027 E-mail: limptintinc@gmail.com,humanrights.researchgroup@gmail.com,      globalaids_hivcureinteraction@yahoo.co.uk

MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT: BROCKTON SUPERIOR COURT

MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT: BROCKTON SUPERIOR COURT

November 30, 2011
__________________________________________________________________________________

                        PLYMOUTH SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT
                       Brockton Superior Court, Brockton, MA  Session
               
                      Complaint Against The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke
                           
                             SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF COMPLAINT

                                              Summary of Complaint

 Hon. Justice Jeffrey A. Locke and Clerk/Magistrate connived together  to implement severe forms of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE under vicious extra-process/procedural malpractice via Conflict of Interest, to the extent that the major defendants are Department of Children and Families (DCF) and its staff, to the extent that Judge Locke is former Commissioner of DCF and openly defending DCF in open Court and sanctioning Complainant from filing lawsuits against his former employer, DCF; to the extent that action of Judge Locke clearly and avertly  identifies support for the persecutory action of DCF against Complainant and other uglier action of Complainant's political rivals;  to the extent that they (rivals) have used rush court eviction /homelessness, seizure of Complainant's children by DCF and economic sanction/ persecution as tools to distabilize Complainant's campaign for the President of Nigeria 2015; to the extent that  the following cases which will  stop seizure of Complainant's children via eviction /homelessness and harsh economic  sanction and persecution have been sanctioned and placed in a hiden place and the assistant clerks have searched for the most important two cases (b and d below); to the extent that Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate have sanctioned the three emergency lawsuits that would stop these paid political action; to the extent that these three cases are summarized as follows b, c. and d );   to the extent that the Eviction Summary Proceedings before the Brockton Housing Court is returnable for December 7, 2011 and this rush eviction/homelessness is the 8th in less than two years;  and to the extent that  in SECRET COURTROOM Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate made mockery of Complainant and consolidated these different cases and called them one case and issued one docket number 11-126A to the four cases  and ordered that summons not be issued to move the cases forward:    


a. Police arrest, improper and punitive handcuff, parade of children and adult before the public, charges, and prosecution - Holyoke Police Department (HPD) et a. l Phillip Ofume v. HPD Docket No. ?


b.  Transfer of family unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton - Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) - Phillip Ofume v. DHCD Docket No.  ?


c.  Unlawful impounding, seizure, confiscation  and possession of properties and goods valued over $60million belonging to Dr. Phillip C. Ofume and Mrs. Maureen N. Ofume and their children and NGOs -Phillip Ofume v. DCF et al Docket No. 11- 1260


d.   Payment of child and adult benefits - DTA.  Phillip Ofume v. DTA Docket No. ?
                                             

                                                             Fact

1.              The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke  - Former Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families (DCF) or Department of Social Services (DSS).  Judge Locke and Clerk of the Court have created consolidation of four different and unrelated cases to obstruct justice and waive burden of adverse decision on Judge Locke's former check cutter or employer or  DCF/DSS.

2.            Unofficially and officially, directly and indirectly, all the defendants/respondents mentioned in paragraph 1 above are connected by several corruptive ways such as color, race, political affiliation, etc. DCF and its staff are lead defendants in two of the four lawsuits. The two  cases listed as b and d are sanctioned by the Judge and Clerk/Magistrate to enable eviction/homelessness take place to enable seizure of children occur. These agencies and related service providers ( mayors, court/Judges, DCF/DSS, DHCD, DTA, police/sheriff, etc) have worked together under the clout of color, race and extended  politics to implement these incesant homelessness and brutal economic sanction/persecution path to re-seize Complainant's children which is not mentioned in this Complaint to the extent that there is an on-going case in Canada   of the theft of over $150,000.00 of Complainant's children benefits  which they want to sweep under the rug by re-seizing these children and eliminating other benefitiaries or parents (see the disclosure of the Government of Canada on this theft).  


3.   Effective October 25, 2011 Clerk/Magistrate started receiving these four lawsuits and impounded and seized them and either takes them home or keeps them in hidden location where assistant clerks and other court staff will not locate the case files. Complainant/Plaintiff has visited the clerk's office several times and called for his file. Remarkably two  staff have tried to find the case files in place where majority/minority of the case files are kept but they failed to find the files.


4.     Three ( Ofume v. DHCD,  Ofume v. DCF et al and Ofume v. DTA)  of the four cases are cases of less than 48 hours emergency to single Judge and taken by The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke. These cases are emergency  because DCF and other calloborators  have setup another plot to again and again use Eviction and homelessness to re-seize Complainant/Plaintiff's children as they did on January 31, 2011 and custody restated on February 8, 2011 by Order of Judge presiding in the Holyoke Juvenile Court.


5.     Judge Jeffrey and Clerk/Magistrate of the Brockton Superior Court have censored docketing and hearing of the emergency complaint, Ofume v. DHCD which is Emergency Complaint seeking short Order in nature of commanding DHCD to transfer Complainant's over seven months unused family shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton to enable Complainant and his family continue the rent at their apartment in Brockton which was politically placed under summary eviction proceedings in Brockton District Court (Housing Division) on October 27, 2011.  Notwithstanding that no rent was owing under USCIS Nebraska Service Center politically motivated delay to approve Complainant and his family's EAD  and application for renewal of EAD which was made since January 1, 2011 early  enough for EAD which will expire on April 29, 2011. USCIS  joined Judges, Clerk/Magistrate, courts, DHCD, DTA, landlords, etc to  sanction right to work and right to other services including right to file cases in Court, etc. and put income of this family at $0.00.


6.    August 2009 - present, Plaintiff and his family have suffered 7 evictions and several homelessness and 8th plot is about to occur.  Judge Jeffrey and Clerk/Magistrate are delaying Complainant's emergency complaint (Ofume v. DHCD) to enable Brockton District Court (Housing Division) issue EVICTION ORDER against the Complainant and his family to enable DCF re-seize the children of the Complainant.


7.   Another important emergency Complaint censored by the Clerk/Magistrate is  Ofume v. DTA and Ofume v. DCF et al. Ofume v. DTA is requesting this court to order DTA to pay benefits  (food stamps, cash benefit, etc) to Plaintiff/Complainant's children and adults pending issuance of Employment Authorization Document (EAD) by the USCIS, Nebraska Service Center and employment. At present, the income of the family is $0.00/month. Across the United States these are the secret actions of the DCF/DSS designed to seize the children of non-whites and others profiled which setting affloat this plot DCF/DSS accuses them as being unable in task to provide for their children or family.


8.   In the court proceedings, Judge Jeffrey acts like Commissioner of DCF/DSS and he disbelieves Complainant and believed  DCF and other defendants. For example during full court costs hearing, to have free day in branding Complainant liar and throwing full support for  DCF  the Clerk and Judge Locke tactically evacuated the courtroom to create SECRET COURTROOM. After removing attorneys and others in the courtroom, one attorney stayed in to know what's up but the clerk carefully removed him and  Judge Locke rose to enable complete evacuation occur before the court backup for the secret  hearing of Complainant/Plaintiff's cases.


9.     Effective October 25, 2011 Dr. Phillip Chukwuma Ofume filed four (4) different lawsuits against DCF, Holyoke Police Department, DCF and Staffs of DCF, Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistance (DTA) and New England Farm Workers Council (NEFWC) and its Staff


10.     These four different and unrelated cases filed with the Brockton Supewrior Court and only one Complaint  which not is important at this material time has been assigned Docket Number 11-1260.  Restating that two cases ( b and d) of the four complaints or cases require less than 48 hours emergency hearing and order to enable defendants transfer unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton and issue temporary vouchers to stop politicized court eviction which is politically designed to re-seize Complainant's children. To properly understand that the presiding Judge  is more of  DCF/DSS Commissioner in court, he sanctioned  the two cases that will prevent six Black Children and two Black parents from homelessness, loss of education, starvation and removal of these children by criminals  (DCF/DSS and its child vendor clients). In the other front, the Assistant Court Clerks have been searching for these two cases without success because the Clerk/Magistrate must have kept in unseen place or took the case files to his home or to his sponsors to get favor.


 11.     In two proceedings Judge Locke encountered enormous difficulty and unable to act or rule against DCF/DSS. The Clerk of Court is informant and  errand runner to/from Judge Locke and he (Clerk) hijacked and censored  three major complaints which are urgent tools to stop 8th politicized eviction/homelessness in less than two years. Soon after and started campaigning for consolidation of all the four (4) different and unrelated complaints .


12.     Complainant strongly Objects to Consolidation because it is designed to obstruct justice, delay the complaints to facilitate issuance of eviction order, hasten removal of children by the defendants:      These are four different and unrelated  cases and summarized by fact/evidence of Cause of Action as follows:
When Plaintiff asked  Judge Locke to explain why these cases must be consolidated, Judge Locke said nothing.


Consolidation will destroy and obstruct intended justice in these four different and unrelated lawsuits:

a. Police arrest, improper and punitive handcuff, parade of children and adult before the public, charges, and prosecution - Holyoke Police Department (HPD) et a. l Phillip Ofume v. HPD Docket No. ?


b.  Transfer of family unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton - Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) - Phillip Ofume v. DHCD Docket No.  ?


c.  Unlawful impounding, seizure, confiscation  and possession of properties and goods valued over $60million belonging to Dr. Phillip C. Ofume and Mrs. Maureen N. Ofume and their children and NGOs -Phillip Ofume v. DCF et al Docket No. 11- 1260


d.   Payment of child and adult benefits - DTA.  Phillip Ofume v. DTA Docket No. ?



                                                                     Relief


In accordance with Section 3B(9) of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Code of Judicial Conduct and strongly reliant on the foregoing,  Complainant request this Honourable Commission to immediately and expressly  remove The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke from the  Complainant's four (4) Complaints filed with this Court starting from October 25, 2011,  because of conflict of interest, abused mindset which impedes the ability of the Judge and Clerk/Magistrate to act judiciously and in good faith, prevent consolidation of four different and unrelated cases which aim to brew obstruction of justice, urgent consideration of emergency fact/evidence to stop the plot mentioned above, because Judge Locke is former commissioner of the defendants or DCF and its staff and he is handicapped to use available  remedies such as  just rule or rule of law against his former eemployer, obstruction of intended justice and leading Complainant and his family to suffer expanded irreparable harm variously aforementioned.  



 Respectfully submitted,
For:  IHRRG, IHRRC, LIMPT, INC. & ASSOCIATES
(EDUCATION & WORKFORCE PROJECT -  USA CHAPTER)

____________________
Phillip  C. Ofume, Ph.D
Complainant and National Coordinator
506 Warren Avenue #2 Brockton, MA  02301 Tel. 781-479-9027 E-mail: limptintinc@gmail.com,humanrights.researchgroup@gmail.com,      globalaids_hivcureinteraction@yahoo.co.uk

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

OPEN NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF DCF/DSS TO PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, VICE-PRESIDENT JOSEPH BIDEN, CONGRESS/ REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM, ETC.



OPEN NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF DCF/DSS TO PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, VICE-PRESIDENT JOSEPH BIDEN, CONGRESS/ REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM, ETC.    

London, UK  October 1, 2011

   
Copyright Instructions – All rights reserved under Universal Copyright Convention by the Author. No part of this text may be reproduced and prepared by any means including derivative works, distribute, perform, and publicly display this text without written/signed consent of the Authors: LIMPT, INC. ET AL


                                                   
AMERICAN NATIONAL ACADEMY FOR FOSTER, ADOPTIVE AND ORPHAN CHILDREN (NAFOC)

                                         MISSION

All adoptive, foster and orphan child(ren) must be outside the Department of Children and Families or Department of Social Services (DCF or DSS) and related organization or agency.

Under LIMPT, INC. et al (NAFOC) collaborations across the United States, foster, adoption and orphanage programs will be institutionalized and made zonal academy where all children in minor, medium and high needs, care and protection are placed for short period of time and some cases longer time but not more than two years based on needs and they will be returned to nuclear parents/family or extended family.  

No foster, adoptive and orphan child(ren) will be given to stranger who are not members of these families.  On  before the return to parents or extended families, parents or extended families will be granted unlimited visiting rights to their children (brothers, nephews, sisters and nices) and also participate ceremonially during the short stay.


NAFOC has designed a new humane and institutionalized techniques to put together plans and programs such as boarding housing, education (pre-K-12), safety, care, protection and return to nuclear parents or extended families.

The maximum stay before returning to parents or extended families is two (2) years for children facing severe forms of barrier and need.  
 
NAFOC is strategic child observatory, educational (pre-k – 12),  and reconstruction program, full care and protection structure in practical terms temporarily works on child to child victim diverse  barriers, needs  and return the child to his/her Nuclear Parents or Extended Families.

                         PETITION BY INVESTIGATIVE INQUIRY: U.S. DCF/DSS

In the United States, the operating  governmental programs by the Department of Social Services  or Children and Families (DSS or DCF) and related non-governmental  organization dealing with foster, adoption and orphanage programs are dubious and threat to American nuclear parents and families and extended parents/families, foreign and migrant parents/families and their extended parents/families; experts; investors; professionals;  constitution and democratic institution of America; etc.  Several children in need and with barriers which require education, care and protection are not  seized and taken into its custody by the DCF/DSS.




                    JURISDICTION AND SECURITY OF CHILD'S RIGHTS

The children in the custody of DCF/DSS and its clients across the United States are Americans and non-American. NAFOC  is a comprehensive replacement of the services of the Department of Children and Families or Social Services (DCF or DSS) across the United States because the services of the DSS or DCF outrageously and severely infringe upon the entire rights of American/non-American  children in DCF/DSS custody or its clients’ custody. Conducts of these keepers disregard 1st and 4th Amendments of the Constitution and Bill of Rights of the United States;  the League of Nations Declaration of 1924; United Nations’ Declaration of the Rights of the Child (1959); U.S. Congress on Children’s Rights ( International and National Laws and Practices - see U.S. Congress Law Library); UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989); the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR - 1948); International Bill of Human Rights ( intersecting UNDHR OF 1948);  International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966); etc.

NAFOC reviewed the legislative efforts of over 221 countries and found where they pitch their efforts but child must be respected and secured if host country desires to see safe and livable country in the future because children determine future generation.

                   CARE, PROTECTION AND RE-UNIFICATION

In this academy, NAFOC researched and investigated the rights of  father and mother and their child(ren) in the nuclear family and adult(s) and their child(ren) in the extended families and designed lineage care, unification with NAFOC and re-unification with parents  or extended families plan. In several NAFOC studies more children are  smarter, talented, intelligent, law abiding, humble and brilliant if they are raised in their nuclear and extended families. In NAFOC PROJECT if the nuclear family cannot achieve this goal, extended family will achieve it. A stranger called guardians by the DCF/DSS in major part cannot make achieve it because they see the Child(ren) as stranger and sellable economic property. 

Americans must come back to reality and start retracting her nuclear and extended family system or culture  and civilization. Additionally, NAFOC carefully researched and investigated U.S. domestic laws, lawmakers' personal mindset and their parental hereditary history, public policies and practices that affect child(ren)'s development, education, health, longevity welfare, creation of barriers, needs, ugly impact of DCF/DSS and juvenile justice which are based on politics of bloc and activism. US Juvenile Justice has created more harm as DCF/DSS and along this foothold,  children victim are placed in more and more harm way as they go along with the garment which the Juvenile Justice wore them. 

Mistreatment conducts and other barbarous policies and practices of the DCF/DSS and their intended guardians in custody towards innocent children are worse than Roman Empire's policies and  practices taken from the barbarous origin and primitive character [(See Table VI, Law I, II and III. S.P. Scott, The Civil Law, Vol. XII, 64-65 (The Central Trust Company 1932)] which returnable in the United States in distraction of the Rights and Freedoms of the Child and Parents and extended families.

     URGENCY OF  INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF CARE AND PROTECTION

Institutionalization of the foster, adoption and orphanage programs is urgent because of the harm created by DCF or DSS around the American and foreign nuclear parents, extended families and and their children's education, care, safety and protection across the United States.

The reason foreign investors, immigrants, families, experts and professionals are scared is because DCF/DSS programs are similar to permanent abduction and disappearance of loved child(ren) into the hands of strangers and criminal profiteers. 

Institutionalized Temporary Program of child(ren)’s   education, care, safety, custody and reunification with the nuclear and extended families is made up of teaching and learning curriculum pre-k-12 and also encompasses but unlimited to child's  focus and refocus plan;  major formal and informal course syllabus k-12; child development to better adult;  interactive educational career with strategic formal and informal teaching and learning courses to move the child to greater normal behavioral level; healthy care and  protection environment through good meal and happiness creation tools; techniques preparatory plan for reunification with nuclear or extended families

           NAFOC FURTHER INTERVENTIONARY PROGRAM

NAFOC  is non-governmental, non-profit and non-political  subdivision of LIMPT, INC. Internal bid-in-assignment made NAFOC a Division of LIMPT, INC.  It’s mandate is a  direct replacement of the services of the Department of Children and Families or Social Services (DCF or DSS) across the United States.

DCF/DSS serves child adopters and peddlers.  NAFOC is educational institution with tools to make child become useful to his/her parents, family and society in general. Educational program of NAFOC  is formally and informally interactive,  pre-k -12. The program encompasses but unlimited to unified, general and per tete curricula; guidance/counseling; teaching/learning methodologies;  interactive teaching and learning, focus reconstruction of child of victim of barriers, needs  and return to nuclear parents or extended families.

Under National Class Action Project (PANC), NAFOC will lead Parents or Extended families DCF/DSS to render child to child account of several missing children, rely on legal process to compel those holding custody to restate custody or return  removed children, brothers and sisters and other action since the birth of DCF or DSS in the United States to parents or extended families. No government and its agencies and private entity have the rights to engage in monetize and other forms of slave trade or sell of children under the auspice or pretenses  of adoption and foster care and protection.

Institutionalization of the Foster, Adoption and Orphanage programs in the United States is long awaited by parents and families because of the harm created by DCF/DSS on  parents/families  including problem of unknown destination of  their children. Majority of the children removed by the DCF/DSS loss focus of their  Development, Education, Care,  Protection, and Safety and their nuclear family and extended families are unable to render account because of lack information and contact.
 
The moneyed and self-centered activities of the DSS or DCF are scaring and steer  psychological fear on American and foreign parents and families,  investors, experts,  migrant parents and families, diminish the position of America on child(ren)’s  Development, Education, Care,  Protection, and Safety globally.

Majority of the programs of the DCF or DSS and other non-governmental foster, adoption and orphanage organization are forcible abduction and the client granted custody unlawfully apply full ownership of the child(ren)  immediately and possession status of the children, such as change their names, birth information and other natal particulars and seal/blind  the gap between parents and child with disappearance tactics to make such nuclear parents and extended families will not see, meet and recognize their children, brothers and sisters including their heritage.

    U.S. DSS/DCF:  REASON FOR SEIZING CHILDREN SUMMARIZED

DSS/DCF and hate groups across the United States, sponsor sanctions (education, training, employment, housing and other social services, utilities, and other means of livelihood) against targeted parents and families to accuse them of care and protection deficiency such as NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES in order to create path to seize and remove targeted child(ren).

Under  bloc and personal hate politics and other connecting forms of hate, lobbied, influenced and associating lawmakers make laws that would support the action of the DCF/DSS and hate groups to facilitate seizure and removal of child(ren) into destructive adoptive, foster and orphan programs where the child(ren) will lose their education and/or be eliminated and vanish forever from the eyes of their nuclear parents and extended families.

In the United States they are child peddlers who pay DCF/DSS's staff to allocate over twenty (20) adoptive, foster and orphan children to them to make money out of them and as result create heaven on earth. In process of imposing sanction on parents and families to seize their children, these peddlers and DCF/DSS influence providers of education, training, employment, housing and other social services, utilities, and other means of livelihood. Soon as the child(ren) is removed within few days, the services will be normalized, increased and returned to the child(ren) and the person holding custody of the child(ren). Because these services were sanctioned nuclear parents were accused of failure of parental responsibility of NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES.

 Child peddlers are very rich because of several dubious businesses surrounding these activities. Apart from the mass wealth got from child support, alimony, child benefits, child tax, etc bigger money is got from the secret part of the business such as tactical murder of the child and sale of the body parts of the child to rich people waiting for lever transplant and other surgeries. Anonymous confession in Canada revealed that one lever could be purchased for not less than $800,000.00 (CAD). 

 "DSS or DCF is child merchant in secret and moneyed collaborations with christian and other child adoption agencies to seize innocent and good children from parents and sell them to foster kid intl and other child adopters purpose of organ commercialization, slavery, child abuse, child/other benefits, etc" (Mike Klan 3.2.2006)


2011 sample focus case of NAFOC in the United States is a "family of ten (two parents and eight children - names and some other information reserved)."   This family is talented, smart, gifted, brilliant, A/A+ in schools, medical report fitness is 100%, longevity history of the extended family members who died by natural cause, is over 103 years. DCF/DSS and the housing agencies or some of the US domestic child peddlers presented several documents in form of release to donate body parts; sign life insurance program; Christian god father/mother power of   custody; etc. When this family refused to sign these documents, DCF/DSS, court, housing agencies and other child peddlers created fast eviction process and removed the children and few hours after the forcible removal and filing petition for custody with the Juvenile Court order, DCF/DSS shared the children into the care and custody of child peddlers in distance places and deleted the addresses of the distance placement.

Teachers, mounted School Guidance/Counslor, Police and Nurse virtue of hate and other trivial concerns and interests may write damaging incident reports and forward copies to Physicians and DCF/DSS. Several physicians and DCF/DSS staff are activists and political partisan and without fault recommend mental care and protection on a normal child. Swiftly, without investigation, court order,  DCF/DSS will classify the child as a child in need of urgent care and protection and move into the family to seize the child and transfer him/her to unknown destination.

In the neighborhood and school hate associated with ethnicity, racial hate, creed, jealous and other animosity may result to frivolous or fictitious  complaint and other reporting which are made in form of domestic violence, harassment, bullying, spanking and other abuses.  Without  investigation and court process/proceedings, DCF/DSS will draft police into the family and seize  the children in the household and disperse the children into hands of awaiting adoption applicants. 

In the school, neighborhood and community, under person to person hate incidents are sent to DCF/DSS by anonymous letter, telephone, etc. Without investigation, DCF/DSS will remove a child and swiftly file petition for custody in Juvenile Court based on race, color, and background of caller and complainant.

Lawyers /Attorneys are tactically by persuasion imposed to represent  parents of the child victim and DCF/DSS. Reason for this imposition is to create secret association line to make both attorneys/lawyers work together to disadvantage parents and find path to place the child in foster and adoption program which is stranger to nuclear and extended families. DCF/DSS will assist the person holding custody of the child to secretly change the particulars of the child victim immediately and lobby service providers to provide services that were sanction and move further plead additional services all of which were not provided to the child and his/her parents.

In Custody case, working and wealthy parents and families are impoverished during several years of child custody litigation and before the end of the case, child victim would have become mature adult and unable to retract or recognize his/her place of origin, parents, siblings and extended families because some dubious people who take custody from the DCF/DSS within days of custody, change the name and other birth particulars, social security number,  relocate to distance address or oversea, sanction upto one penny in child's pocket, block freedom of association with co-tenant and neighborhood, registration in distance school and outside neighborhood schools,   etc

Heartlessly, under politics of bloc, DCF/DSS places smart, talented, gifted, A/A+/B+ children in custody of illiterate or less educated people to make the children loss their educational career. Several kids were placed in custody of people who use them for child labor to make them forfeit their education as they continue to collect the benefits of the child.  DCF/DSS has lobbied teachers and used blackmail to influence teachers to under mark/score the child victim to trigger disengagement from school. DCF/DSS has used people having custody of the child to create diversionary programs including  harassment and bullying to force child victim to dropout  from school. For example, DCF/DSS has placed this category of students in custody of non-English speaking guardian who operates non-English speaking church. In addition to requesting the school bus to pickup this child late to make the child miss two or one course each day, soon as the child comes back from school the guardian will force the child to go to the non-English speaking church and the child will remain there up to 10.00 pm and soon as they arrive from the church, they will force the child to go to sleep without doing her school and  homework and other school assignments.    

Mandate of the DSS or DCF is widely circulated and it declared that,
“ Individuals and families that adopt through The Department of Children and Families come from all walks of life. You do not have to have a specific education or background.”

Overtly, DCF/DSS is an agency empowered  by state and federal laws to implement varieties of social services but more identified with the activities of forcible seizing and removal of children and process leading to permanent forfeiture of the child during adoption which is in greater part outright sale of the child. Also covertly it is a political entity designed to destroy targeted political, racial and ethnic bloc and most affected are parents/families and their children that are smart, talented, gifted and earning A/A+/B+ in school and in majorly in political bloc strand.

Several unhealthy children with barriers which require help are not removed because these children will exhaust their personal profits and will not sustain any competition in different sectors of the operating economies and in adoption/foster/orphan destination will not be lucrative.





 NUCLEAR PARENTS AND EXTENDED FAMILIES - CHILD REMOVAL ENDLESS TEARS, MOURNING AND PAINS

  Nuclear and extended families know that the removal of their children, brothers, nephew/nice, sisters is to “the land of no return” and that their loved ones are gone forever. Mothers’ pains during pregnancy and child birth of the child are most felt and remembered during removal.                                          
Under national and international collaboration, American and Immigrant/Migrant nuclear parents and families and their extended families will  no longer face the dreadful pains and mourning felt  during and after the forcible removal of their loved children without hope to see them again because the unknown child merchants take these children forever and upon removal  swiftly they  change child’s   names,  birth certificates, sometimes use plastic surgery to change some of their natural features, change jurisdiction several times to distance place where the parents cannot  find them.

In course of this work in the United States of America, project researchers and investigators found  two forms of mourning, 

1.      physical death of loved one by  natural cause, accident and other causes    AND;
2.      forcible takeaway or removal of parents’ child(ren) into foster, adoption and orphanage conditions by the Department of Social Services (DSS) or Department of Children and Families (DCF) because the journey is similar to death.   


             HISTORICAL POINT OF DEPARTURE AND ARRIVAL

Under international collaboration, this project started mid-1960s to stop child spankling in old British Christian Colonial Elementary and Secondary School System. In 1970s in France, during Dr. Phillip Chukwuma Ofume and Associates' work on Educational Anthropology and Ethnology and Labour Science (particularly strength of parents at home, workplace and education/care of the child inside/outside school) and review of Christian Colonial Archives they gathered more information on how to raise untortured, smart, brilliant, and talented child. Some of the dates of the initial Order for Release are,  Halifax, Canada 02/16/1999 and Re-mastered:   Boston, USA 08/20/2008.     

Takeover by  LIMPT, INC. (EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE PROJECT) of the entire child care and protection work and services of the Department of Social Services or Department of Children and Families in the United States is not measure which is unexpected by parents; extended families, foreign migrants, parents, families, experts, investors and governments of America. 

ENTRY POINT ACADEMIC AND NON-ACADEMIC STAFF OF THE ACADEMY

 Associate researching, investigating and reviewing  Non-governmental organizations are LIMPT, INC. and International Human Rights Research Group,  Council  and Associates (IHRRG/IHRRC/ASSOCIATES) in part outstanding in the art of developing and raising exemplary and matchless smart and  talented child(ren), developing  curricula relating to uncovering barriers and post-barrier needs. This system of experts and specialists is also in charge of American National Academy for Decongestion of Prison and Education of Prisoners.

In addition to some of the under-listed, academic administrative and management staff must have doctorate or equivalent and graduate study and research qualifications and over ten (10) years experience as pre-requisite to join the administrative and management levels of the academy. All academic administrative and management staff must attend two months program training before he/her will be confirmed to intended position.

         COSTS ACTION-STEP STATISTICS AND ANALYSIS

NAFOC is non-profit and non-governmental institution. It will be funded by donation, non-profit corporation grant/loan, design funding proposals, and tax deductible fundraising. Will not seek fund from political and related organizations. It will collaborate with other non-profit and non-political organization to raise fund.



____________________________
Phillip C. Ofume, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                                      Acting National Coordinator (Academics)

Godson Etiebet, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                                   Director, Curriculum Development and Implementation

 Cynthia H. Taylor, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                                Director of Policy and Strategy

 Farruk Mohammad, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                      Assistant  Director of Policy and Strategy
 
Tan Ochollu, D.Lit.                                                                                                                                                                      Director of Transition/Counseling
 
Reid MacDonald, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                              Director of Inter-institutional Cooperation
 

Kris Kifindi Bunkheti, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                           Director of Recruitment and Project Expansion/Diversification

  Jerome Tesfai, D. Min/Div                                                                                                                                         Director of Parents/Families and Institutional Relations

LIMPT, INC. (PROVOST-ELECT OF NAFOC)

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS RESEARCH COUNCIL (IHRRC)

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS RESEARCH GROUP (IHRRG)

NETLINK INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (NLICS);

 OIL AND CHEMICAL WATCH INTERNATIONAL (OCWI);

AFRICAN CANADIAN IMMIGRANT SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION (ACISA);

INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT IN AFRIK (NIPAD).
 

Copyright Instructions – All rights reserved under Universal Copyright Convention by the Authors. No part of this text may be reproduced and prepared by any means including derivative works, distribute, perform, and publicly display this text without written/signed consent of the Authors: LIMPT, INC. ET AL

Contact Information:
P. O. Box 2416
Lynn, MA USA 01903


NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER:

Disclaimer: We (authors and publishers) have experienced series of high handed cyber attacks
such as deleting of words and sentences from our write-ups; distorting
and confusing the meaning of our letters/report/advertisement/
articles; returning and destroying our e-mail and snail mail; changing
and distorting write-ups on-line; importing strange ideas into our
write-ups; etc. In the light of this, we hereby advise you to
disregard the activities of these cyber-vultures and contact us for
signed hard copies directly from the Publishers.


Thursday, February 9, 2012

INVITATION FOR COLLABORATION TO TAKEOVER THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND DEPARTMEN OF SOCIAL SERVICE (DCF/DSS) AND PLACED UNDER NAFOC''