Wednesday, November 30, 2011

MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT: BROCKTON SUPERIOR COURT

MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT: BROCKTON SUPERIOR COURT

November 30, 2011
__________________________________________________________________________________

                        PLYMOUTH SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT
                       Brockton Superior Court, Brockton, MA  Session
               
                      Complaint Against The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke
                           
                             SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF COMPLAINT

                                              Summary of Complaint

 Hon. Justice Jeffrey A. Locke and Clerk/Magistrate connived together  to implement severe forms of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE under vicious extra-process/procedural malpractice via Conflict of Interest, to the extent that the major defendants are Department of Children and Families (DCF) and its staff, to the extent that Judge Locke is former Commissioner of DCF and openly defending DCF in open Court and sanctioning Complainant from filing lawsuits against his former employer, DCF; to the extent that action of Judge Locke clearly and avertly  identifies support for the persecutory action of DCF against Complainant and other uglier action of Complainant's political rivals;  to the extent that they (rivals) have used rush court eviction /homelessness, seizure of Complainant's children by DCF and economic sanction/ persecution as tools to distabilize Complainant's campaign for the President of Nigeria 2015; to the extent that  the following cases which will  stop seizure of Complainant's children via eviction /homelessness and harsh economic  sanction and persecution have been sanctioned and placed in a hiden place and the assistant clerks have searched for the most important two cases (b and d below); to the extent that Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate have sanctioned the three emergency lawsuits that would stop these paid political action; to the extent that these three cases are summarized as follows b, c. and d );   to the extent that the Eviction Summary Proceedings before the Brockton Housing Court is returnable for December 7, 2011 and this rush eviction/homelessness is the 8th in less than two years;  and to the extent that  in SECRET COURTROOM Judge Locke and Clerk/Magistrate made mockery of Complainant and consolidated these different cases and called them one case and issued one docket number 11-126A to the four cases  and ordered that summons not be issued to move the cases forward:    


a. Police arrest, improper and punitive handcuff, parade of children and adult before the public, charges, and prosecution - Holyoke Police Department (HPD) et a. l Phillip Ofume v. HPD Docket No. ?


b.  Transfer of family unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton - Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) - Phillip Ofume v. DHCD Docket No.  ?


c.  Unlawful impounding, seizure, confiscation  and possession of properties and goods valued over $60million belonging to Dr. Phillip C. Ofume and Mrs. Maureen N. Ofume and their children and NGOs -Phillip Ofume v. DCF et al Docket No. 11- 1260


d.   Payment of child and adult benefits - DTA.  Phillip Ofume v. DTA Docket No. ?
                                             

                                                             Fact

1.              The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke  - Former Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families (DCF) or Department of Social Services (DSS).  Judge Locke and Clerk of the Court have created consolidation of four different and unrelated cases to obstruct justice and waive burden of adverse decision on Judge Locke's former check cutter or employer or  DCF/DSS.

2.            Unofficially and officially, directly and indirectly, all the defendants/respondents mentioned in paragraph 1 above are connected by several corruptive ways such as color, race, political affiliation, etc. DCF and its staff are lead defendants in two of the four lawsuits. The two  cases listed as b and d are sanctioned by the Judge and Clerk/Magistrate to enable eviction/homelessness take place to enable seizure of children occur. These agencies and related service providers ( mayors, court/Judges, DCF/DSS, DHCD, DTA, police/sheriff, etc) have worked together under the clout of color, race and extended  politics to implement these incesant homelessness and brutal economic sanction/persecution path to re-seize Complainant's children which is not mentioned in this Complaint to the extent that there is an on-going case in Canada   of the theft of over $150,000.00 of Complainant's children benefits  which they want to sweep under the rug by re-seizing these children and eliminating other benefitiaries or parents (see the disclosure of the Government of Canada on this theft).  


3.   Effective October 25, 2011 Clerk/Magistrate started receiving these four lawsuits and impounded and seized them and either takes them home or keeps them in hidden location where assistant clerks and other court staff will not locate the case files. Complainant/Plaintiff has visited the clerk's office several times and called for his file. Remarkably two  staff have tried to find the case files in place where majority/minority of the case files are kept but they failed to find the files.


4.     Three ( Ofume v. DHCD,  Ofume v. DCF et al and Ofume v. DTA)  of the four cases are cases of less than 48 hours emergency to single Judge and taken by The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke. These cases are emergency  because DCF and other calloborators  have setup another plot to again and again use Eviction and homelessness to re-seize Complainant/Plaintiff's children as they did on January 31, 2011 and custody restated on February 8, 2011 by Order of Judge presiding in the Holyoke Juvenile Court.


5.     Judge Jeffrey and Clerk/Magistrate of the Brockton Superior Court have censored docketing and hearing of the emergency complaint, Ofume v. DHCD which is Emergency Complaint seeking short Order in nature of commanding DHCD to transfer Complainant's over seven months unused family shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton to enable Complainant and his family continue the rent at their apartment in Brockton which was politically placed under summary eviction proceedings in Brockton District Court (Housing Division) on October 27, 2011.  Notwithstanding that no rent was owing under USCIS Nebraska Service Center politically motivated delay to approve Complainant and his family's EAD  and application for renewal of EAD which was made since January 1, 2011 early  enough for EAD which will expire on April 29, 2011. USCIS  joined Judges, Clerk/Magistrate, courts, DHCD, DTA, landlords, etc to  sanction right to work and right to other services including right to file cases in Court, etc. and put income of this family at $0.00.


6.    August 2009 - present, Plaintiff and his family have suffered 7 evictions and several homelessness and 8th plot is about to occur.  Judge Jeffrey and Clerk/Magistrate are delaying Complainant's emergency complaint (Ofume v. DHCD) to enable Brockton District Court (Housing Division) issue EVICTION ORDER against the Complainant and his family to enable DCF re-seize the children of the Complainant.


7.   Another important emergency Complaint censored by the Clerk/Magistrate is  Ofume v. DTA and Ofume v. DCF et al. Ofume v. DTA is requesting this court to order DTA to pay benefits  (food stamps, cash benefit, etc) to Plaintiff/Complainant's children and adults pending issuance of Employment Authorization Document (EAD) by the USCIS, Nebraska Service Center and employment. At present, the income of the family is $0.00/month. Across the United States these are the secret actions of the DCF/DSS designed to seize the children of non-whites and others profiled which setting affloat this plot DCF/DSS accuses them as being unable in task to provide for their children or family.


8.   In the court proceedings, Judge Jeffrey acts like Commissioner of DCF/DSS and he disbelieves Complainant and believed  DCF and other defendants. For example during full court costs hearing, to have free day in branding Complainant liar and throwing full support for  DCF  the Clerk and Judge Locke tactically evacuated the courtroom to create SECRET COURTROOM. After removing attorneys and others in the courtroom, one attorney stayed in to know what's up but the clerk carefully removed him and  Judge Locke rose to enable complete evacuation occur before the court backup for the secret  hearing of Complainant/Plaintiff's cases.


9.     Effective October 25, 2011 Dr. Phillip Chukwuma Ofume filed four (4) different lawsuits against DCF, Holyoke Police Department, DCF and Staffs of DCF, Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistance (DTA) and New England Farm Workers Council (NEFWC) and its Staff


10.     These four different and unrelated cases filed with the Brockton Supewrior Court and only one Complaint  which not is important at this material time has been assigned Docket Number 11-1260.  Restating that two cases ( b and d) of the four complaints or cases require less than 48 hours emergency hearing and order to enable defendants transfer unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton and issue temporary vouchers to stop politicized court eviction which is politically designed to re-seize Complainant's children. To properly understand that the presiding Judge  is more of  DCF/DSS Commissioner in court, he sanctioned  the two cases that will prevent six Black Children and two Black parents from homelessness, loss of education, starvation and removal of these children by criminals  (DCF/DSS and its child vendor clients). In the other front, the Assistant Court Clerks have been searching for these two cases without success because the Clerk/Magistrate must have kept in unseen place or took the case files to his home or to his sponsors to get favor.


 11.     In two proceedings Judge Locke encountered enormous difficulty and unable to act or rule against DCF/DSS. The Clerk of Court is informant and  errand runner to/from Judge Locke and he (Clerk) hijacked and censored  three major complaints which are urgent tools to stop 8th politicized eviction/homelessness in less than two years. Soon after and started campaigning for consolidation of all the four (4) different and unrelated complaints .


12.     Complainant strongly Objects to Consolidation because it is designed to obstruct justice, delay the complaints to facilitate issuance of eviction order, hasten removal of children by the defendants:      These are four different and unrelated  cases and summarized by fact/evidence of Cause of Action as follows:
When Plaintiff asked  Judge Locke to explain why these cases must be consolidated, Judge Locke said nothing.


Consolidation will destroy and obstruct intended justice in these four different and unrelated lawsuits:

a. Police arrest, improper and punitive handcuff, parade of children and adult before the public, charges, and prosecution - Holyoke Police Department (HPD) et a. l Phillip Ofume v. HPD Docket No. ?


b.  Transfer of family unused shelter benefits from Holyoke to Brockton - Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) - Phillip Ofume v. DHCD Docket No.  ?


c.  Unlawful impounding, seizure, confiscation  and possession of properties and goods valued over $60million belonging to Dr. Phillip C. Ofume and Mrs. Maureen N. Ofume and their children and NGOs -Phillip Ofume v. DCF et al Docket No. 11- 1260


d.   Payment of child and adult benefits - DTA.  Phillip Ofume v. DTA Docket No. ?



                                                                     Relief


In accordance with Section 3B(9) of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Code of Judicial Conduct and strongly reliant on the foregoing,  Complainant request this Honourable Commission to immediately and expressly  remove The Honourable Justice Jeffrey A. Locke from the  Complainant's four (4) Complaints filed with this Court starting from October 25, 2011,  because of conflict of interest, abused mindset which impedes the ability of the Judge and Clerk/Magistrate to act judiciously and in good faith, prevent consolidation of four different and unrelated cases which aim to brew obstruction of justice, urgent consideration of emergency fact/evidence to stop the plot mentioned above, because Judge Locke is former commissioner of the defendants or DCF and its staff and he is handicapped to use available  remedies such as  just rule or rule of law against his former eemployer, obstruction of intended justice and leading Complainant and his family to suffer expanded irreparable harm variously aforementioned.  



 Respectfully submitted,
For:  IHRRG, IHRRC, LIMPT, INC. & ASSOCIATES
(EDUCATION & WORKFORCE PROJECT -  USA CHAPTER)

____________________
Phillip  C. Ofume, Ph.D
Complainant and National Coordinator
506 Warren Avenue #2 Brockton, MA  02301 Tel. 781-479-9027 E-mail: limptintinc@gmail.com,humanrights.researchgroup@gmail.com,      globalaids_hivcureinteraction@yahoo.co.uk

No comments:

Post a Comment