Thursday, August 4, 2011

MASSACHUSETTS NORTHEAST HOUSING COURT: CORRUPTION & DISADVANTAGES OF OIL/GAS RESOURCES IN NIGERIA

MASSACHUSETTS NORTHEAST HOUSING COURT: CORRUPTION & DISADVANTAGES OF OIL/GAS RESOURCES IN NIGERIA

August 4, 2011

Firsthand view of the case articled is located at:  

http://www.google.com/#pq=phillip%20ofume%20v.%20akhtor%20tarar&hl=en&sugexp=bvie&cp=9&gs_id=bl&xhr=t&q=ofume+v.+tarar&qe=b2Z1bWUgdi4gdGFyYXI&qesig=1auU5mEuvSLziefJMJm71Q&pkc=AFgZ2tmRK16oLTeu8uraKXexbx23anGycNmE9WDYgkTRoKFmFN5mqPgTaZb0PQpEoNZ6Ae4lwk5yZXkkVTPjZdZ6NIQJqx7QxA&pf=p&sclient=psy&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=ofume+v.+tarar&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=e7a0bbe362cc4009&biw=1366&bih=624


Ofume family with  cash to cover rents and any  post credit check  deposit which credit company  may secretly advice landlords and real estate agents and any emerging surplus payment to rent or buy house in the  CITY OF LYNN, MA and any politically sponsored consequences which the recent launching of the head of family (Dr. Phillip Chukwuma Ofume) political campaign for the President of Nigeria 2015 may vent into the intended negotiation (see Canada, Ofume v. CIBC – The Supreme Court of Canada 2003) rent or buy home in the City of Lynn, MA.


Upon relocating, Virginia to Massachusetts and further to Lynn because of the job of two members of the family within this district,  information from the Office of the Mayor of the City of Lynn, MA advised the family that the Mayor of the City of Lynn and the Public Schools are bought by the Nigeria’s Oil/Gas companies, Departments  of Education, etc and that they will not allow the family to live in the City of Lynn, MA.  Other reason for this secret blockade is the good work of LIMPT, INC. in Education and Workforce. See http://groups.google. com/group/soc.org.nonprofit/browse_thread/thread/e468fe7fc5ab37f1# ;  http://groups.google. com/group/soc.org.nonprofit/topics?pli=1


Search here and there,  landlords and real agents were lobbied and buy home and rent apartment are securely sanctioned. Under further search to implement force domicile, the family found vacant apartment located at 66 Harwood Street Unit #3 Lynn, MA 01902 and a tip indicated that the landlord resides in Houston, TX and search linked the family with the agent of the landlord. She told the family to pay months advance to enable her connect heat from Unit 2, by stove, fix door and window , buy rugs, unblock blocked kitchen and toilet sinks, pay exterminator and other workers, etc. She connected the family with the landlord and the landlord said the same thing.


On January 21, 2011 the Ofume family paid her and date of move in was suggested and agreed. On February 9, 2011 when the Ofumes arrived at 66 Harwood Street Unit 3, Lynn, MA shocked overwhelmed them, nothing was fixed. Worst, no heat, stove, toilet/kitchen sink blocked, etc. Front and back no hope and nowhere to go, the family was forced to take the apartment as it’s.


In March 2011 the agent and landlord advised the Ofumes to pay more money to enable them fix the multiple defects and the Ofumes paid additional money. One company which alleged that its name is  “Uroy Construction Co.” (Cambridge, MA) came to replace one of the windows but before it started work, the staff told the Ofumes that the landlord requested them to demand labour costs from the Ofumes. The Ofumes refused and the compay left.



Ofumes realized that the landlord and her agent are not alone and people above (mayor and others) must be behind the cloud of the scene. At this point, the Ofumes filed complaints with the Department of Health and Human Services (Inspectional Service) and The Massachusetts Northeast Housing Court, Lawrence, MA and in support of their complaint, they filed several interlocutory motions and served all parties. Several citations were issued, civil to criminal citations without compliance enforcement. The landlord and the mayor of the City of Lynn, used money to spoil the court and Inspectional Service.



The Court abandoned the Ofumes case and took landlord’s Complaint for Possession and Eviction. The Court also ignored Motion for Stay of landlord’s complaint which was duplicated and new and placed landlord’s case in XFAST TRACK under Summary Process Proceeding within less than one month eviction and possession. The Judge through purported housing “specialist” issued eviction/possession before kangaroo proceeding or hearing by housing specialist. The court  used non-monetized means to recover peanut or about $5,500.00 of the family’s claim of over $6million.  



___________________________________________________________________


                  COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
LAWRENCE DIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST HOUSING COURT DEPARTMENTOF THE TRIAL COURT
                              CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-SP-1530
____________________________________________________________________________


AKHTAR TARAK  
                                                                                                                                                                                                 Respondent/Plaintiff


       v.

PHILLIP CHUKWUMA OFUME                                                                                                                                              Applicant/Defendant

_____________________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S VERIFIED  EMERGENCY MOTION (EX-PARTE) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME  AND TEMPORARY STAY OF ORDER FOR MORE TWENTY (20) DAYS OR ONE (1) MONTH  TO FIND APARTMENT AND RELOCATE  OUT FROM DISPUTED APARTMENT (66 HARWOOD STREET UNIT 3 LYNN, MA 01902) AND RESTRAINING ORDER OF THE COURT ON RESPONDENT (LANDLORD) TO DESIST FROM DISUADING INTENDED LANDLORDS FROM RENTING APARTMENT TO APPLICANT AND HIS FAMILY PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 10 OF THE SUMMARY PROCESS AGREEMENT (05/31/2011).
_____________________________________________________________________________

         Pursuant to paragraph 10 of the Summary Process Agreement,  Applicant, Dr. Phillip Chukwuma Ofume, respectfully file this Motion for the following reason in-brief:

1.      Effective May 31, 2011 sequel settlement of this case (EXHBIT “A”) , Applicant and his family mobilized themselves in several directions thus, almost across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in search of apartment and several apartments were found.

2.    Over five (5) apartments were negotiated and confirmed as being suitable but current landlord or Respondent portrait Applicant and his family as unfit and untrue background was  released to these landlords and fatally discouraged intended  landlord from renting out apartment to the Applicant and his family.    

3.   Shortlist (Reduction of Document Act) of the apartments and the list negotiated and confirmed  and general list and later destroyed by the Respondent are hereto attached or listed below with their particulars and fully incorporated and marked EXHIBITS “B” and “C”. These landlords did not grant Applicant and his family counterclaim or defence rights:


3.a.  Negotiated, Confirmed, and accepted by the landlord and applicant and his family (Ofumes):

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-SP-1530   OFUME V. TARAR



3. a.i.  Mayberry Communities Apartment Management (Park Street Lynn, MA): Apt for rent - 10 Lawton Avenue, Apt. # 1 Lynn, MA 01904

3.b.ii    111 Foster Street  Peabody, MA Tel. 978-771-0373

3.c.iii     145-135 Ward Street Revere, MA

3.c.iv.     Claudel Jeannot, 1 White Oak Drive, Nashua, NH 03063  Apt. located at 34 Shermam St. Peabody  Tel/Fax 1-9783302860

Etc.

4.    Applicant and his family are sending this Motion to the Court because the current landlord has misinformed several landlords by mischaracterizing Applicants and his family. Applicant request this Court to issue restraining order on the landlord to enable Applicant and his family find apartment.


5.     July 25 – 31, 2011 final search negotiated several apartments and issued to the owners withholding cash deposit to the landlords and their agents.


6.     Due to the disruptive position of the current landlord, period of  Twenty (20) days will enable Applicant change housing search strategy including retaining paid independent apartment locators and search agents.    


7.    Two heads of Applicant’s family’s  Credit Report  issued by Experian Credit Company were accepted by the real estate agents or landlord and on this ground Applicant and his family are save and several landlords renting lawfully without politics would rent to them.


                                         RELIEF          


WHEREFORE, the A requests that this Honourable Court grant my Motion, due failure of the landlord to respect para 10 of the SPA, constitutional and bill of right values in the United States to render six children and two adults homeless because they have money to rent apartment but the heartless conduct of the landlord aborts this rights to be inside the roof.  Court to grant other relief the itt deems appropriate.
Respectfully submitted, under pains and penalty of perjury.


_________________________
Phillip C.  Ofume, Ph.D.
P. o. Box 2416
Lynn, MA 01903

Contact/service information of the Landlord
Mrs. Akhtor Tarar
8011 Bova Road
Houston, TX 77064

Mr. Patrick  J. McDonoug – Chief Housing Specialist

No comments:

Post a Comment